Endre Zoltán H
Department of Nephrology, Prince of Wales Hospital, and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia.
Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;127(1-4):180-4. doi: 10.1159/000363555. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
The clinical implementation of urinary and plasma renal injury biomarkers has been hampered by the variability associated with nonstandardized commercially available biomarker assays, uncertainty and variations in patient selection criteria, and the absence of context-specific cutoffs for biomarker concentrations. These limitations are increased by comparison with serum creatinine to define acute kidney injury. The critical problem affecting biomarker performance is patient heterogeneity involving the cause, context (including comorbidity and baseline renal function), and timing of the injury. We suggest strategies for stratifying subjects to provide appropriate context, and illustrate a creatinine-independent method for defining thresholds for biomarker concentrations in these contexts which utilizes the same sensitivity for the clinical outcomes of dialysis or death. Large multicenter cohort studies are needed to validate the proposed cutoffs.
尿液和血浆肾损伤生物标志物的临床应用受到多种因素的阻碍,包括非标准化商用生物标志物检测方法的变异性、患者选择标准的不确定性和变异性,以及缺乏针对生物标志物浓度的特定背景下的临界值。与血清肌酐相比来定义急性肾损伤会进一步加剧这些局限性。影响生物标志物性能的关键问题是患者的异质性,包括损伤的原因、背景(包括合并症和基线肾功能)以及损伤发生的时间。我们提出了对受试者进行分层以提供适当背景的策略,并说明了一种不依赖肌酐的方法来定义这些背景下生物标志物浓度的阈值,该方法对透析或死亡的临床结局具有相同的敏感性。需要开展大型多中心队列研究来验证所提议的临界值。