• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[特拉匹韦三联疗法用于初治丙型肝炎患者的成本效用分析]

[Cost-utility analysis of triple therapy with telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C patients].

作者信息

Buti María, Gros Blanca, Oyagüez Itziar, Andrade Raúl J, Serra Miguel A, Turnes Juan, Casado Miguel A

机构信息

Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia, Madrid..

Hospital Vall d' Hebrón, Barcelona..

出版信息

Farm Hosp. 2014 Sep 16;38(5):418-29. doi: 10.7399/fh.2014.38.5.7640.

DOI:10.7399/fh.2014.38.5.7640
PMID:25344136
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of Hepatitis C (HCV) in Spain is 2,5%, with a high morbimortality rate. Triple therapy based on telaprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin ([T/PR]) has demonstrated to be an effective approach in treatment-naïve G1-HCV patients. This analysis evaluated, through a Markov model, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of triple therapy compared to peginterferon/ ribavirin ([PR]) alone in naïve patients depending on fibrosis stage, from the Spanish Healthcare Authorities perspective.

METHODS

Efficacy results and adverse events incidence were based on the combined results of ADVANCE and OPTIMIZE studies. Adverse events and disease-related costs (€, 2014) were built up from panel expert opinion except from transplant and post-transplant costs, taken from published data. Drug costs were obtained from national databases and adjusted for the mandatory deduction. Outcomes and costs were both discounted at 3%/year.

RESULTS

The analysis shows higher costs and improved outcomes associated with [TR/PR] relative to [PR] alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €18,288/ QALY for all the cohort, €14,152QALY for moderate fibrosis, €11,364QALY for bridging fibrosis, €15,929/QALY for cirrhosis. Over a lifetime period, the use of [T/PR] could avoid 12 cirrhosis and 4 liver transplants per 1,000 patients compared to [PR] alone. The probabilistic analysis, following 10,000 Montecarlo simulations, demonstrated the probability of an ICER below a €30,000/QALY gained threshold of 69%. At a willingness- to-pay of €30,000/QALY, [T/PR] could be considered as an efficient option compared with [PR] alone for treatment-naïve genotype 1 HCV patients, over a lifetime horizon.

摘要

引言

西班牙丙型肝炎(HCV)的患病率为2.5%,病亡率很高。基于特拉匹韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林([T/PR])的三联疗法已被证明是初治G1-HCV患者的有效治疗方法。本分析通过马尔可夫模型,从西班牙医疗当局的角度评估了三联疗法与单纯聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林([PR])相比,在初治患者中根据纤维化阶段的增量成本-效果比。

方法

疗效结果和不良事件发生率基于ADVANCE和OPTIMIZE研究的综合结果。不良事件和疾病相关成本(欧元,2014年)除移植和移植后成本(取自已发表数据)外,均由专家小组意见得出。药物成本从国家数据库中获取并根据强制扣除进行调整。结果和成本均按每年3%进行贴现。

结果

分析表明,与单纯[PR]相比,[TR/PR]的成本更高,但结果有所改善,所有队列的增量成本-效果比(ICER)为18,288欧元/质量调整生命年,中度纤维化患者为14,152欧元/质量调整生命年,桥接纤维化患者为11,364欧元/质量调整生命年,肝硬化患者为15,929欧元/质量调整生命年。在整个生命周期内,与单纯[PR]相比,使用[T/PR]每1000名患者可避免12例肝硬化和4例肝移植。经过10,000次蒙特卡洛模拟的概率分析表明,ICER低于每获得一个质量调整生命年30,000欧元阈值的概率为69%。在支付意愿为每质量调整生命年30,000欧元的情况下,与单纯[PR]相比,对于初治基因型1 HCV患者,在整个生命周期内,[T/PR]可被视为一种有效的选择。

相似文献

1
[Cost-utility analysis of triple therapy with telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C patients].[特拉匹韦三联疗法用于初治丙型肝炎患者的成本效用分析]
Farm Hosp. 2014 Sep 16;38(5):418-29. doi: 10.7399/fh.2014.38.5.7640.
2
Cost-effectiveness of telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin in previously untreated chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients.替拉瑞韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素α和利巴韦林治疗初治慢性丙型肝炎基因 1 型患者的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):65-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.860033. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
3
Cost utility of telaprevir-PR (peginterferon-ribavirin) versus boceprevir-PR and versus PR alone in chronic hepatitis C in The Netherlands.在荷兰,替拉普韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素-利巴韦林(telaprevir-PR)、博赛泼维联合聚乙二醇干扰素-利巴韦林(boceprevir-PR)与单用聚乙二醇干扰素-利巴韦林(PR)治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益比较
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Dec;12(6):647-59. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0120-y.
4
Cost-effectiveness of telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin in treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients.telaprevir 联合聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎 1 型经治患者的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):77-87. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.844159. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of triple therapy with protease inhibitors in treatment-naive hepatitis C patients.初治丙型肝炎患者使用蛋白酶抑制剂三联疗法的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Oct;31(10):919-31. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0080-3.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of boceprevir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Portugal.葡萄牙 boceprevir 治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染的成本效益分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Feb;11(1):65-78. doi: 10.1007/s40258-012-0007-8.
7
A cost utility analysis of simeprevir used with peginterferon + ribavirin in the management of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度,对simeprevir联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林用于治疗基因1型丙型肝炎病毒感染进行成本效用分析。
J Med Econ. 2015;18(10):838-49. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1044457. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Telaprevir combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C.替拉瑞韦联合治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 6;9(3):e90295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090295. eCollection 2014.
9
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of sofosbuvir, peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Early treatment in the initial stage of fibrosis vs. delayed treatment in advanced fibrosis].索磷布韦、聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析:纤维化初期的早期治疗与晚期纤维化的延迟治疗对比
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug-Sep;39(7):449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
10
Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(40kDa)联合利巴韦林治疗HIV与丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的成本效益分析
J Clin Virol. 2006 Aug;36(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficiency of Increased HCV Testing and Treatment Strategies in Spain to Achieve Elimination Goals.西班牙提高丙型肝炎病毒检测与治疗策略以实现消除目标的效率
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Mar;8(2):221-233. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00458-3. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
The impact of direct acting antivirals on hepatitis C virus disease burden and associated costs in four european countries.直接作用抗病毒药物对四个欧洲国家丙型肝炎病毒疾病负担和相关成本的影响。
Liver Int. 2021 May;41(5):934-948. doi: 10.1111/liv.14808. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
3
Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain.
在西班牙成年人一般人群中实施丙型肝炎筛查的医疗保健价值。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0208036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208036. eCollection 2018.