Vergho Daniel, Burger Maximilian, Schrammel Moritz, Brookman-May Sabine, Gierth Michael, Hoschke Bernd, Lopau Kai, Gilfrich Christian, Riedmiller Hubertus, Wolff Ingmar, May Matthias
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Julius-Maximilians University Medical Center of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany,
World J Urol. 2015 May;33(5):725-31. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1423-1. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
Living kidney donation (LKD) involves little risk for the donor and provides excellent functional outcome for transplant recipients. However, contradictory data exist on the incidence and degree of impaired renal function (IRF) in the donor. Only few studies compared the incidence of IRF in donors with that of patients having undergone radical nephrectomy (RN).
From 1992 to 2012, 94 healthy subjects underwent an open nephrectomy for living kidney donation at the University Medical Center of Würzburg. These patients were compared with matched subjects who had the same surgical procedure for renal cell carcinoma at the Carl-Thiem Hospital Cottbus (1:1 matching using propensity scores).
In the LKD-group, no complication ≥ Grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification occurred. Donors had a preoperative median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 85.1 ml/min which changed to 54.4, 57.0 and 61.0 ml/min (all p < 0.001 in comparison with baseline) on postoperative days 7-10, 365 and 730, respectively. While median eGFR between LKD- and RN-groups was nearly equal (85.1 vs. 85.3 ml/min; p = 0.786), median immediate postoperative eGFR was significantly lower in the LKD-group (54.3 vs. 60 ml/min; p = 0.002). Furthermore, in LKD, the percentage decrease compared with baseline was significantly higher (34.4 vs. 32 %; p = 0.017).
In living kidney donors, median eGFR decreased by 34.4 % immediately after surgery. Compared with matched RN-patients, immediate postoperative IRF is significantly more pronounced. One explanation may be that in kidney tumor patients, compensatory adaptive filtration activity of the contralateral kidney sets in already preoperatively.
活体肾捐赠(LKD)对供体风险极小,且能为移植受者带来极佳的功能预后。然而,关于供体肾功能受损(IRF)的发生率和程度存在相互矛盾的数据。仅有少数研究比较了供体与接受根治性肾切除术(RN)患者的IRF发生率。
1992年至2012年,94名健康受试者在维尔茨堡大学医学中心接受了开放性肾切除术以进行活体肾捐赠。将这些患者与在科特布斯卡尔 - 蒂姆医院因肾细胞癌接受相同手术的匹配受试者进行比较(使用倾向得分进行1:1匹配)。
在LKD组中,未发生根据Clavien - Dindo分类≥3级的并发症。供体术前估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)中位数为85.1 ml/min,术后第7 - 10天、365天和730天分别变为54.4、57.0和61.0 ml/min(与基线相比,所有p < 0.001)。虽然LKD组和RN组的eGFR中位数几乎相等(85.1对85.3 ml/min;p = 0.786),但LKD组术后即刻eGFR中位数显著更低(54.3对60 ml/min;p = 0.002)。此外,在LKD中,与基线相比的下降百分比显著更高(34.4对32%;p = 0.017)。
活体肾供体术后即刻eGFR中位数下降了34.4%。与匹配的RN患者相比,术后即刻IRF明显更显著。一种解释可能是,在肾肿瘤患者中,对侧肾脏的代偿性适应性滤过活动在术前就已开始。