Lutherville, Md. From the Plastic Surgery Center of Maryland.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):726e-735e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000627.
The literature has witnessed an evolution in brachioplasty technique since the procedure was introduced by Thorek in 1930. Aesthetic refinements in brachioplasty have been increasingly described in the literature, and this has paralleled the rise in the massive weight loss population. The aim of this review is to share the plastic surgery experience with this challenging body region and present different approaches to achieve the best results for a broad spectrum of patients.
A literature review studying brachioplasty was performed through PubMed. Throughout the literature there has been debate about scar placement, scar length, application of liposuction, drain placement, and optimization of outcomes, and differences of opinion have been compared.
There is no definitive best method of brachioplasty, as evidenced by multiple classification systems which present algorithms for management depending on presentation. Not only does approach differ depending on degree of presentation, but there are also different approaches depending on author for similar manifestations. Approaches vary through incision length, incision placement, and use of liposuction. Outcomes studies similarly reveal lack of consensus.
This literature review has elucidated multiple approaches to brachioplasty, and the pearls and pitfalls described may all be incorporated to produce excellent outcomes and patient satisfaction in an individualized approach.
自 1930 年 Thorek 首次介绍该手术以来,文献见证了乳房成形术技术的演变。乳房成形术的美学改进在文献中越来越多地被描述,这与大量体重减轻人群的增加是同步的。本综述的目的是分享在这个具有挑战性的身体区域的整形手术经验,并介绍不同的方法,以实现广泛患者的最佳效果。
通过 PubMed 对乳房成形术进行了文献复习。纵观文献,关于疤痕位置、疤痕长度、吸脂应用、引流管放置以及优化结果一直存在争议,并且已经对不同的观点进行了比较。
乳房成形术没有明确的最佳方法,这一点可以从多个分类系统中得到证明,这些系统根据表现提出了管理算法。不仅处理方法因表现程度而异,而且对于类似表现,作者之间也有不同的处理方法。方法通过切口长度、切口位置和吸脂术的应用而有所不同。同样,结局研究也显示缺乏共识。
本文献综述阐明了乳房成形术的多种方法,所描述的要点和陷阱都可以纳入个体化方法,以产生出色的结果和患者满意度。