Méndez Orellana C, Visch-Brink E, Vernooij M, Kalloe S, Satoer D, Vincent A, van der Lugt A, Smits M
From the Departments of Radiology (C.M.O., M.V., S.K., A.v.d.L., M.S.) Neurology (C.M.O., E.V.-B).
Neurology (C.M.O., E.V.-B) Neurosurgery (E.V.-B., D.S., A.V.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;36(3):518-24. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4147. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Determining language dominance with fMRI is challenging in patients with brain tumor, particularly in cases of suspected atypical language representation. Supratentorial activation patterns must be interpreted with great care when the tumor is in or near the presumed language areas, where tumor tissue or mass effect can lead to false-negative fMRI results. In this study, we assessed cerebrocerebellar language fMRI lateralization in healthy participants and in patients with brain tumors with a focus on atypical language representation.
Twenty healthy participants and 38 patients with a brain tumor underwent fMRI with a verb-generation task. Cerebral and cerebellar language lateralizations were separately classified as left-sided, right-sided, or symmetric. Electrocortical stimulation was performed in 19 patients. With the McNemar test, we evaluated the dependency between language lateralization in the cerebrum and cerebellum, and with Pearson correlation analysis, the relationship between the cerebral and cerebellar lateralization indices.
There was a significant dependency between cerebral and cerebellar language activation, with moderate negative correlation (Pearson r = -0.69). Crossed cerebrocerebellar language activation was present in both healthy participants and patients, irrespective of handedness or typical or atypical language representation. There were no discordant findings between fMRI and electrocortical stimulation.
Language lateralization in the cerebellum can be considered an additional diagnostic feature to determine language dominance in patients with brain tumor. This is particularly useful in cases of uncertainty, such as the interference of a brain tumor with cerebral language activation on fMRI and atypical language representation.
利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)确定脑肿瘤患者的语言优势具有挑战性,尤其是在怀疑存在非典型语言表征的情况下。当肿瘤位于假定的语言区域或其附近时,幕上激活模式的解读必须格外谨慎,因为肿瘤组织或占位效应可能导致fMRI结果出现假阴性。在本研究中,我们评估了健康参与者和脑肿瘤患者的脑-小脑语言fMRI偏侧化情况,重点关注非典型语言表征。
20名健康参与者和38名脑肿瘤患者接受了动词生成任务的fMRI检查。大脑和小脑的语言偏侧化分别被分类为左侧、右侧或对称。对19名患者进行了皮层电刺激。我们使用McNemar检验评估大脑和小脑语言偏侧化之间的相关性,并使用Pearson相关分析评估大脑和小脑偏侧化指数之间的关系。
大脑和小脑语言激活之间存在显著相关性,呈中度负相关(Pearson r = -0.69)。无论利手情况或典型或非典型语言表征如何,健康参与者和患者均存在交叉性脑-小脑语言激活。fMRI与皮层电刺激之间没有不一致的结果。
小脑的语言偏侧化可被视为确定脑肿瘤患者语言优势的一项额外诊断特征。这在存在不确定性的情况下尤其有用,例如脑肿瘤对fMRI上大脑语言激活的干扰以及非典型语言表征。