LaPrade Christopher M, Smith Sean D, Rasmussen Matthew T, Hamming Mark G, Wijdicks Coen A, Engebretsen Lars, Feagin John A, LaPrade Robert F
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):200-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546514554769. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
The current standard for treating complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction, which requires reaming a tibial tunnel. Based on recent anatomic and biomechanical studies, this reconstruction tunnel may cause injuries to the anterior meniscal root attachments.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to determine if injuries occurred to the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) meniscal root attachments because of reaming a tibial reconstruction tunnel in the anatomic center of the ACL footprint. It was hypothesized that tibial tunnel reaming for ACL reconstruction would result in significant decreases in the attachment area and in ultimate failure strength for the AL root.
Controlled laboratory study.
Twelve matched pairs of human cadaveric knees were tested. One knee from each pair remained intact, while the contralateral knee was reamed with a tibial tunnel for an anatomic ACL reconstruction. The attachment areas of the anterior meniscal roots were measured with a coordinate measuring device before and after tunnel reaming. The anterior meniscal roots were then pulled to failure with a dynamic tensile testing machine.
There was a significant mean decrease in the attachment area for the AL root (%Δ, 38%; 95% CI, 25-51) after ACL tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P=.003). The mean ultimate failure strength of the native AL root (mean, 610 N; 95% CI, 470-751) was significantly stronger (P=.015) than that of the AL root with a reamed ACL reconstruction tunnel (mean, 506 N; 95% CI, 353-659). Tunnel reaming did not significantly affect the AM root attachment area or ultimate failure strength.
Tibial tunnel reaming during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction significantly decreased the AL meniscal root attachment area and ultimate failure strength. The AM root was not significantly affected by reaming of the ACL reconstruction tunnel. Future studies should investigate the clinical importance of these iatrogenic injuries to the AL root.
The ACL reconstruction tunnels reamed in the center of the ACL tibial footprint caused a significant decrease in the attachment area and ultimate strength of the AL meniscal root attachment. Clinically, repositioning guide pins placed in the lateral aspect of the ACL attachment before tibial tunnel reaming may minimize iatrogenic injuries to the AL meniscal root attachment.
目前治疗前交叉韧带(ACL)完全撕裂的标准方法是重建,这需要在胫骨上扩孔形成隧道。基于近期的解剖学和生物力学研究,这种重建隧道可能会损伤半月板前角附着点。
目的/假设:目的是确定在ACL足迹的解剖中心进行胫骨重建隧道扩孔时,内侧半月板前角(AM)和外侧半月板前角(AL)附着点是否会受到损伤。研究假设是,为ACL重建进行胫骨隧道扩孔会导致AL半月板前角附着面积和极限破坏强度显著降低。
对照实验室研究。
对12对匹配的人体尸体膝关节进行测试。每对中的一个膝关节保持完整,而对侧膝关节通过胫骨隧道扩孔用于解剖学ACL重建。在隧道扩孔前后,使用坐标测量装置测量半月板前角的附着面积。然后用动态拉伸试验机将半月板前角拉伸至破坏。
与完整状态相比,ACL隧道扩孔后AL半月板前角附着面积平均显著减小(Δ%,38%;95%可信区间,25%-51%)(P = 0.003)。天然AL半月板前角的平均极限破坏强度(平均值,610 N;95%可信区间,470-751 N)显著高于有扩孔ACL重建隧道的AL半月板前角(平均值,506 N;95%可信区间,353-659 N)(P = 0.015)。隧道扩孔对AM半月板前角附着面积或极限破坏强度没有显著影响。
在解剖单束ACL重建过程中进行胫骨隧道扩孔会显著降低AL半月板前角附着面积和极限破坏强度。AM半月板前角不受ACL重建隧道扩孔的显著影响。未来的研究应调查这些医源性AL半月板前角损伤的临床重要性。
在ACL胫骨足迹中心扩孔形成的ACL重建隧道导致AL半月板前角附着面积和极限强度显著降低。临床上,在胫骨隧道扩孔前将定位导针放置在ACL附着点的外侧可能会将医源性AL半月板前角损伤降至最低。