Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):468. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0468-x.
Clinically relevant examples of stratified medicine are available for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to understand the current economic evidence for stratified medicine in RA. Two systematic reviews were conducted to identify: (1) all economic evaluations of stratified treatments for rheumatoid arthritis, or those which have used a subgroup analysis, and (2) all stated preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis. Ten economic evaluations of stratified treatments for RA, 38 economic evaluations including with a subgroup analysis and eight stated preference studies were identified. There was some evidence to support that stratified approaches to treating a patient with RA may be cost-effective. However, there remain key gaps in the economic evidence base needed to support the introduction of stratified medicine in RA into healthcare systems and considerable uncertainty about how proposed stratified approaches will impact future patient preferences, outcomes and costs when used in routine practice.
分层医学在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中已有临床相关实例。本研究旨在了解 RA 分层医学的当前经济证据。进行了两项系统评价,以确定:(1)所有针对类风湿关节炎分层治疗的经济评估,或那些使用亚组分析的评估,以及(2)所有针对类风湿关节炎治疗的陈述偏好研究。确定了 10 项针对 RA 分层治疗的经济评估,38 项包含亚组分析的经济评估和 8 项陈述偏好研究。有一些证据支持分层方法治疗 RA 患者可能具有成本效益。然而,在支持将 RA 中的分层医学引入医疗保健系统所需的经济证据基础方面仍存在关键差距,并且对于在常规实践中使用拟议的分层方法如何影响未来患者的偏好、结果和成本存在很大的不确定性。