Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;67(3):714-23. doi: 10.1002/art.38932.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the combination of glucosamine and chondroitin in relieving knee symptoms and slowing disease progression among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The 4-year followup data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative data set were analyzed. We used a "new-user" design, for which only participants who were not using glucosamine/chondroitin at baseline were included in the analyses (n = 1,625). Cumulative exposure was calculated as the number of visits when participants reported use of glucosamine/chondroitin. Knee symptoms were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and structural progression was determined by measuring the joint space width (JSW). To control for the time-varying confounders that might be influenced by previous treatments, we used marginal structural models to estimate the effects on OA of using glucosamine/chondroitin for 3 years, 2 years, and 1 year. RESULTS: During the study period, 18% of the participants initiated treatment with glucosamine/chondroitin. After adjustment for potential confounders with marginal structural models, we found no clinically significant differences between users at all assessments and never-users of glucosamine/chondroitin in WOMAC pain (β = 0.68 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.16 to 1.53]), WOMAC stiffness (β = 0.41 [95% CI 0 to 0.82]), and WOMAC function (β = 1.28 [95% CI -1.23 to 3.79]) or JSW (β = 0.11 [95% CI -0.21 to 0.44]). CONCLUSION: Use of glucosamine/chondroitin did not appear to relieve symptoms or modify disease progression among patients with radiographically confirmed OA. Our findings are consistent with the results of meta-analyses of clinical trials and extend those results to a more general population with knee OA.
目的:本研究旨在评估氨基葡萄糖和软骨素联合使用在缓解膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者膝关节症状和减缓疾病进展方面的疗效。
方法:对 Osteoarthritis Initiative 数据集的 4 年随访数据进行分析。我们采用“新使用者”设计,仅将基线时未使用氨基葡萄糖/软骨素的参与者纳入分析(n=1625)。累积暴露量计算为参与者报告使用氨基葡萄糖/软骨素的就诊次数。采用 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)测量膝关节症状,通过测量关节间隙宽度(JSW)确定结构进展情况。为了控制可能受先前治疗影响的时变混杂因素,我们使用边缘结构模型估计使用氨基葡萄糖/软骨素 3 年、2 年和 1 年对 OA 的影响。
结果:在研究期间,18%的参与者开始使用氨基葡萄糖/软骨素治疗。在使用边缘结构模型调整潜在混杂因素后,我们发现所有评估时点的使用者与从未使用者在 WOMAC 疼痛(β=0.68[95%置信区间(95%CI)-0.16 至 1.53])、WOMAC 僵硬(β=0.41[95%CI 0 至 0.82])和 WOMAC 功能(β=1.28[95%CI -1.23 至 3.79])或 JSW(β=0.11[95%CI -0.21 至 0.44])方面均无临床显著差异。
结论:在影像学确诊的 OA 患者中,使用氨基葡萄糖/软骨素似乎无法缓解症状或改变疾病进展。我们的研究结果与临床试验的荟萃分析结果一致,并将这些结果扩展到更广泛的膝关节 OA 人群。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020-1-1
Pragmat Obs Res. 2019-4-18
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018-12-12
Stat Med. 2012-9-12
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011-10-14