Yatabe Yasushi, Kerr Keith M, Utomo Ahmad, Rajadurai Pathmanathan, Tran Van Khanh, Du Xiang, Chou Teh-Ying, Enriquez Ma Luisa D, Lee Geon Kook, Iqbal Jabed, Shuangshoti Shanop, Chung Jin-Haeng, Hagiwara Koichi, Liang Zhiyong, Normanno Nicola, Park Keunchil, Toyooka Shinichi, Tsai Chun-Ming, Waring Paul, Zhang Li, McCormack Rose, Ratcliffe Marianne, Itoh Yohji, Sugeno Masatoshi, Mok Tony
*Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan; †Department of Pathology, Aberdeen University Medical School, Aberdeen, United Kingdom; ‡KalGen Laboratory, Stem-cell and Cancer Institute (SCI), Jakarta, Indonesia; §School of Medicine, Monash University Malaysia & Sime Darby Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; ‖Center for Gene and Protein Research, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; ¶Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; #Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; **Research and Biotechnology Division, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City & COS-CENSER, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines; ††Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; ‡‡Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; §§Chulalongkorn GenePRO Center, Chulalongkorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; ‖‖Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea; ¶¶Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan; ##Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China; ***Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, Naples, Italy; †††Division of Hematology/Oncology, Innovative Cancer Medicine Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ‡‡‡Clinical Genomic Medicine/Thoracic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan; §§§Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; ‖‖‖University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; ¶¶¶Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; ###Personalised Healthcare, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; ****Clinical Science Division, Astr
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Mar;10(3):438-45. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000422.
The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients necessitates accurate, timely testing. Although EGFR mutation testing has been adopted by many laboratories in Asia, data are lacking on the proportion of NSCLC patients tested in each country, and the most commonly used testing methods.
A retrospective survey of records from NSCLC patients tested for EGFR mutations during 2011 was conducted in 11 Asian Pacific countries at 40 sites that routinely performed EGFR mutation testing during that period. Patient records were used to complete an online questionnaire at each site.
Of the 22,193 NSCLC patient records surveyed, 31.8% (95% confidence interval: 31.2%-32.5%) were tested for EGFR mutations. The rate of EGFR mutation positivity was 39.6% among the 10,687 cases tested. The majority of samples were biopsy and/or cytology samples (71.4%). DNA sequencing was the most commonly used testing method accounting for 40% and 32.5% of tissue and cytology samples, respectively. A pathology report was available only to 60.0% of the sites, and 47.5% were not members of a Quality Assurance Scheme.
In 2011, EGFR mutation testing practices varied widely across Asia. These data provide a reference platform from which to improve the molecular diagnosis of NSCLC, and EGFR mutation testing in particular, in Asia.
表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对EGFR突变阳性的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者有效,因此需要进行准确、及时的检测。尽管亚洲许多实验室已采用EGFR突变检测,但缺乏每个国家NSCLC患者检测比例及最常用检测方法的数据。
对2011年期间在亚太地区11个国家的40个常规进行EGFR突变检测的机构中接受EGFR突变检测的NSCLC患者记录进行回顾性调查。各机构使用患者记录完成一份在线问卷。
在调查的22193份NSCLC患者记录中,31.8%(95%置信区间:31.2%-32.5%)接受了EGFR突变检测。在检测的10687例病例中,EGFR突变阳性率为39.6%。大多数样本为活检和/或细胞学样本(71.4%)。DNA测序是最常用的检测方法,分别占组织样本和细胞学样本的40%和32.5%。只有60.0%的机构有病理报告,47.5%的机构不是质量保证计划的成员。
2011年,亚洲各地EGFR突变检测实践差异很大。这些数据提供了一个参考平台,可据此改进亚洲NSCLC的分子诊断,尤其是EGFR突变检测。