Jaenichen Hans-Rainer, Pitz Johann
Vossius & Partner, 81675 München, Germany.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Nov 6;5(2):a020941. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020941.
In the public debate about patents, specifically in the area of biotechnology, the position has been taken that patents block the progress of science. As we demonstrate in this review, this is not the case in the European Union (EU). The national patent acts of the EU member states define research and experimental use exemptions from patent infringement that allow sufficient room for research activities to promote innovation. This review provides a comparative overview of the legal requirements and the extent and limitations of experimental use exemptions, including the so-called Bolar provision, in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, and The Netherlands. The legal framework in the respective countries is illustrated with reference to practical examples concerning tests on patent-protected genetic targets and antibodies. Specific questions concerning the use of patent-protected research tools, the outsourcing of research activities, and the use of preparatory and supplying acts for experimental purposes that are necessary for conducting experiments are covered.
在关于专利的公开辩论中,特别是在生物技术领域,有人认为专利阻碍了科学进步。正如我们在本综述中所表明的,在欧盟并非如此。欧盟成员国的国家专利法规定了专利侵权的研究和实验使用豁免,为促进创新的研究活动留出了足够空间。本综述对德国、英国、法国、西班牙、意大利和荷兰的法律要求以及实验使用豁免的范围和限制进行了比较概述,包括所谓的博拉条款。通过关于对专利保护的基因靶点和抗体进行测试的实际例子,说明了各国的法律框架。还涵盖了有关专利保护研究工具的使用、研究活动外包以及为进行实验所需的实验目的的预备和供应行为的使用等具体问题。