Upton L M, Brock P M, Churcher T S, Ghani A C, Gething P W, Delves M J, Sala K A, Leroy D, Sinden R E, Blagborough A M
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Jan;59(1):490-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03942-14. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
To achieve malarial elimination, we must employ interventions that reduce the exposure of human populations to infectious mosquitoes. To this end, numerous antimalarial drugs are under assessment in a variety of transmission-blocking assays which fail to measure the single crucial criteria of a successful intervention, namely impact on case incidence within a vertebrate population (reduction in reproductive number/effect size). Consequently, any reduction in new infections due to drug treatment (and how this may be influenced by differing transmission settings) is not currently examined, limiting the translation of any findings. We describe the use of a laboratory population model to assess how individual antimalarial drugs can impact the number of secondary Plasmodium berghei infections over a cycle of transmission. We examine the impact of multiple clinical and preclinical drugs on both insect and vertebrate populations at multiple transmission settings. Both primaquine (>6 mg/kg of body weight) and NITD609 (8.1 mg/kg) have significant impacts across multiple transmission settings, but artemether and lumefantrine (57 and 11.8 mg/kg), OZ439 (6.5 mg/kg), and primaquine (<1.25 mg/kg) demonstrated potent efficacy only at lower-transmission settings. While directly demonstrating the impact of antimalarial drug treatment on vertebrate populations, we additionally calculate effect size for each treatment, allowing for head-to-head comparison of the potential impact of individual drugs within epidemiologically relevant settings, supporting their usage within elimination campaigns.
为实现疟疾消除,我们必须采用能减少人群接触感染性蚊子的干预措施。为此,多种抗疟药物正在各种传播阻断试验中进行评估,但这些试验未能衡量成功干预的单一关键标准,即在脊椎动物群体中对病例发病率的影响(繁殖数减少/效应量)。因此,目前尚未研究药物治疗导致的新感染减少情况(以及不同传播环境可能对此产生的影响),这限制了任何研究结果的转化应用。我们描述了如何使用实验室种群模型来评估个体抗疟药物在一个传播周期内对伯氏疟原虫二次感染数量的影响。我们在多种传播环境下研究了多种临床和临床前药物对昆虫和脊椎动物群体的影响。伯氨喹(>6毫克/千克体重)和NITD609(8.1毫克/千克)在多种传播环境下都有显著影响,但蒿甲醚和本芴醇(57和11.8毫克/千克)、OZ439(6.5毫克/千克)以及伯氨喹(<1.25毫克/千克)仅在低传播环境下显示出强效疗效。在直接证明抗疟药物治疗对脊椎动物群体的影响的同时,我们还计算了每种治疗的效应量,以便在流行病学相关环境中对个体药物的潜在影响进行直接比较,支持它们在消除疟疾运动中的使用。