Suppr超能文献

意图失败:强制选择测试结果的显著性检验。

Intent to fail: significance testing of forced choice test results.

机构信息

a Independent practice , Portland , OR , USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(8):1366-75. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.978383. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

Abstract

A score that is significantly below the level of chance on a forced choice (FC) performance validity test results from the deliberate production of wrong answers. In order to increase the power of significance testing of a below chance result on standardized FC tests with empirically derived cutoff scores, we recommend using one-tailed tests of significance and selecting probability levels greater than .05 (.20 for most standardized FC tests with empirically derived cutoff scores). Under certain circumstances, we also recommend combining scores from different sections of the same FC test and combining scores across different FC tests. These recommendations require modifications when applied to non-standardized FC tests that lack empirically derived cutoff scores or to FC tests with a non-random topographical distribution of correct and incorrect answers.

摘要

在强制选择(FC)绩效有效性测试中,得分显著低于机会水平,这是由于故意给出错误答案导致的。为了提高基于经验得出的截断分数的标准化 FC 测试中低于机会结果的显著性检验的功效,我们建议使用单侧显著性检验,并选择大于.05(对于大多数基于经验得出的截断分数的标准化 FC 测试,选择.20)的概率水平。在某些情况下,我们还建议将同一 FC 测试的不同部分的分数进行组合,以及将不同 FC 测试的分数进行组合。当应用于缺乏经验得出的截断分数的非标准化 FC 测试或 FC 测试中正确和错误答案的非随机拓扑分布时,这些建议需要进行修改。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验