Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):31-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2022.
Recent estimates indicate that 6.5 million adolescents and young adults in the United States are neither in school nor working. These youth have significant mental health concerns that require intervention.
To determine whether a mental health intervention, integrated into an employment training program that serves adolescents and young adults disconnected from school and work, can reduce depressive symptoms and improve engaged coping strategies.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted; 512 adolescents and young adults newly enrolling in one employment training program site were intervention participants, while 270 youth from a second program site were enrolled as controls. Participants were aged 16 to 23 years and not in foster care. Study recruitment took place from September 1, 2008, to May 31, 2011, with follow-up data collection occurring for 12 months after recruitment. Propensity score matching adjusted for observed baseline differences between the intervention and control groups.
Depressive symptoms measured on a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and engaged coping strategies.
The mean age of participants was 19 years, 93.7% were African American, and 49.4% were male. Six- and 12-month follow-up rates were 61.0% (n = 477) and 56.8% (n = 444), respectively. Males in the intervention group with high baseline depressive symptoms exhibited a statistically significant decrease in depressive symptoms at 12 months (5.64-point reduction in CES-D score; 95% CI, -10.30 to -0.96; P = .02) compared with similar males in the control group. A dosage effect was observed at 12 months after the intervention, whereby males with greater intervention exposure showed greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with similar males with lower intervention doses (effect on mean change in CES-D score, -3.37; 95% CI, -6.72 to -0.09; P = .049). Males and females in the intervention group were more likely than participants in the control group to increase their engaged coping skills, with statistically significant differences found for males (effect on mean change in CES-D score, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.50; P = .001) and females (effect on mean change in CES-D score, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.01-0.37; P = .047) at 12 months.
Given the growing number of adolescents and young adults using employment training programs and the mental health needs of this population, increased efforts should be made to deliver mental health interventions in these settings that usually focus primarily on academic and job skills. Ways to extend the effect of intervention for females and those with lower levels of depressive symptoms should be explored.
最近的估计表明,美国有 650 万青少年和年轻人既不在学校也不在工作。这些年轻人有严重的心理健康问题需要干预。
确定将心理健康干预措施纳入为与学校和工作脱节的青少年和年轻人提供服务的就业培训计划中是否可以减少抑郁症状并改善应对策略。
设计、地点和参与者:进行了一项准实验研究;新参加一个就业培训项目的 512 名青少年和年轻人为干预组参与者,而来自第二个项目的 270 名年轻人被招募为对照组。参与者年龄在 16 至 23 岁之间,未接受寄养。研究招募于 2008 年 9 月 1 日至 2011 年 5 月 31 日进行,在招募后进行了 12 个月的随访数据收集。倾向评分匹配调整了干预组和对照组之间观察到的基线差异。
使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)测量抑郁症状和应对策略。
参与者的平均年龄为 19 岁,93.7%为非裔美国人,49.4%为男性。6 个月和 12 个月的随访率分别为 61.0%(n=477)和 56.8%(n=444)。干预组中基线抑郁症状较高的男性在 12 个月时表现出抑郁症状明显下降(CES-D 评分降低 5.64 分;95%CI,-10.30 至 -0.96;P=0.02)与对照组中类似的男性相比。干预后 12 个月观察到剂量效应,即暴露于更高干预剂量的男性与暴露于较低干预剂量的类似男性相比,抑郁症状改善更大(对 CES-D 评分平均变化的影响,-3.37;95%CI,-6.72 至 -0.09;P=0.049)。干预组的男性和女性比对照组的参与者更有可能增加他们的应对技能,男性的差异具有统计学意义(对 CES-D 评分平均变化的影响,0.32;95%CI,0.14-0.50;P=0.001)和女性(对 CES-D 评分平均变化的影响,0.19;95%CI,0.01-0.37;P=0.047)在 12 个月时。
鉴于越来越多的青少年和年轻人使用就业培训计划以及该人群的心理健康需求,应加大努力在这些通常主要关注学术和工作技能的环境中提供心理健康干预措施。应该探索延长女性和抑郁症状较低者的干预效果的方法。