Park Hoon, Hwang Jin Ho, Seo Joon Oh, Kim Hyun Woo
*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Oct-Nov;35(7):739-45. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000359.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between accessory navicular (AN) and flat foot and to evaluate the association between flat foot and the symptoms of patients with AN.
We enrolled 196 patients with painful or asymptomatic AN in this study. Patients who were older than 18 years or who had no weight-bearing radiographs of the feet were not included. Another 46 normal participants were used as a control group. The AN group was divided into 3 subgroups: a group with asymptomatic AN; a symptomatic group that had not undergone excision; and a symptomatic group that had undergone surgery. Seven radiographic indices were measured including calcaneal pitch angle, tibiocalcaneal angle, talocalcaneal angle, naviculocuboid overlap, talonavicular coverage angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, and AP talo-first metatarsal angle. Groups were compared regarding age, sex, presence of pain at the time of surgery, and radiographic parameters.
The calcaneal pitch angle in the AN group was significantly smaller than that of controls (P=0.004). Naviculocuboid overlap (P=0.001), talonavicular coverage angle (P<0.001), lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (P=0.014), and AP talo-first metatarsal angle (P<0.001) were significantly larger in the AN group than in controls. No significant radiologic differences were seen between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic AN. No significant radiographic differences were found between the groups of patients who had and who had not had bone excised.
AN associated with radiographic parameters felt to be representative of a flat foot; however, the degree of flat foot was not associated with the development and severity of symptoms in patients with AN.
本研究旨在探讨副舟骨(AN)与扁平足之间的关系,并评估扁平足与AN患者症状之间的关联。
本研究纳入了196例有疼痛或无症状的AN患者。年龄超过18岁或没有足部负重X线片的患者未纳入。另外46名正常参与者作为对照组。AN组分为3个亚组:无症状AN组;未行切除术的有症状组;以及已接受手术的有症状组。测量了7个影像学指标,包括跟骨倾斜角、胫跟角、距跟角、舟骰重叠、距舟覆盖角、外侧距第一跖骨角和前后位距第一跖骨角。比较了各组在年龄、性别、手术时疼痛情况和影像学参数方面的差异。
AN组的跟骨倾斜角显著小于对照组(P = 0.004)。AN组的舟骰重叠(P = 0.001)、距舟覆盖角(P < 0.001)、外侧距第一跖骨角(P = 0.014)和前后位距第一跖骨角(P < 0.001)显著大于对照组。有症状和无症状AN患者之间未见明显的影像学差异。行骨切除和未行骨切除的患者组之间未发现明显的影像学差异。
AN与被认为代表扁平足的影像学参数相关;然而,扁平足的程度与AN患者症状的发生和严重程度无关。