Molina Jean-Michel, Clotet Bonaventura, van Lunzen Jan, Lazzarin Adriano, Cavassini Matthias, Henry Keith, Kulagin Valeriv, Givens Naomi, Brennan Clare, de Oliveira Carlos Fernando
Service des Maladies, Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
HIV Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Irsicaixa Foundation, UAB, UVIC-UCC, Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 2;17(4 Suppl 3):19490. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19490. eCollection 2014.
Dolutegravir (DTG) 50 mg once daily was superior to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800 mg/100 mg once daily through Week 48, with 90% vs. 83% of participants achieving HIV RNA 50 c/mL (p=0.025) [1]. We present data through Week 96.
FLAMINGO is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, Phase IIIb non-inferiority study, in which HIV-1-positive ART-naïve adults with HIV-1 RNA≥1000 c/mL and no evidence of viral resistance were randomized 1:1 to receive DTG or DRV/r, with investigator-selected backbone NRTIs (TDF/FTC or ABC/3TC). Participants were stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA (≤100K c/mL) and NRTI backbone.
A total of 484 adults were randomized and treated; 25% had baseline HIV RNA 100K c/mL. At Week 96, the proportion of participants with HIV RNA 50 c/mL was 80% in the DTG arm vs. 68% in the DRV/r arm (adjusted difference 12.4%; 95% CI 4.7, 20.2%; p=0.002). Secondary analyses supported primary results: per-protocol [(DTG 83% vs. DRV/r 70%), 95% CI 12.9 (5.3, 20.6)] and treatment-related discontinuation = failure [(98% vs. 95%), 95% CI 3.2 (-0.3, 6.7)]. Overall virologic non-response (DTG 8%; DRV/r 12%) and non-response due to other reasons (DTG 12%; DRV/r 21%) occurred less frequently on DTG. As at Week 48, the difference between arms was most pronounced in participants with high baseline viral load (82% vs. 52% response through Week 96) and in the TDF/FTC stratum (79% vs. 64%); consistent responses were seen in the ABC/3TC stratum (82% vs. 75%). Six participants (DTG 2, none post-Week 48; DRV/r 4, two post-Week 48) experienced protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF; confirmed viral load 200 c/mL on or after Week 24); none had treatment-emergent resistance to study drugs. Most frequent drug-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea, nausea and headache, with diarrhoea significantly more common on DRV/r (24%) than DTG (10%). Significantly more participants had Grade 2 fasting LDL toxicities on DRV/r (22%) vs. DTG (7%), p<0.001; mean changes in creatinine for DTG (~0.18 mg/dL) observed at Week 2 were stable through Week 96.
Once-daily DTG was superior to once-daily DRV/r in treatment-naïve HIV-1-positive individuals, with no evidence of emergent resistance to DTG in virologic failure and relatively similar safety profiles for DTG and DRV/r through 96 Weeks.
在第48周时,多替拉韦(DTG)每日一次50毫克优于每日一次达芦那韦/利托那韦(DRV/r)800毫克/100毫克,达到HIV RNA<50拷贝/毫升的参与者比例分别为90%和83%(p=0.025)[1]。我们展示了至第96周的数据。
FLAMINGO是一项多中心、随机、开放标签的IIIb期非劣效性研究,将HIV-1 RNA≥1000拷贝/毫升且无病毒耐药证据的初治HIV-1阳性成人按1:1随机分组,接受DTG或DRV/r,并由研究者选择核苷类反转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)骨干药物(替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨或阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定)。参与者按筛查时的HIV-1 RNA(≤100,000拷贝/毫升)和NRTIs骨干药物分层。
共有484名成人被随机分组并接受治疗;25%的人基线HIV RNA>100,000拷贝/毫升。在第96周时,DTG组HIV RNA<50拷贝/毫升的参与者比例为80%,DRV/r组为68%(调整差异12.4%;95%置信区间4.7,20.2%;p=0.002)。次要分析支持主要结果:符合方案分析[(DTG 83% vs. DRV/r 70%),95%置信区间12.9(5.3,20.6)]以及治疗相关停药=失败[(98% vs. 95%),95%置信区间3.2(-0.3,6.7)]。DTG组总体病毒学无应答(DTG 8%;DRV/r 12%)和其他原因导致的无应答(DTG 12%;DRV/r 21%)发生频率更低。与第48周时一样,两组之间的差异在基线病毒载量高的参与者中最为明显(至第96周时应答率分别为82%和52%)以及在替诺福韦酯/恩曲他滨分层中(79% vs. 64%);在阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定分层中观察到一致的应答情况(82% vs. 75%)。6名参与者(DTG组2名,第48周后无;DRV/r组4名,第48周后2名)经历了方案定义的病毒学失败(PDVF;在第24周及之后确认病毒载量≥200拷贝/毫升);无人对研究药物产生治疗中出现的耐药。最常见的药物相关不良事件(AE)为腹泻、恶心和头痛,DRV/r组腹泻显著更常见(24%),高于DTG组(10%)。DRV/r组22%的参与者出现2级空腹低密度脂蛋白毒性,显著高于DTG组的7%,p<0.001;在第2周时观察到DTG组肌酐的平均变化(约0.18毫克/分升)至第96周保持稳定。
对于初治的HIV-1阳性个体,每日一次的DTG优于每日一次的DRV/r,在病毒学失败中没有出现对DTG的新发耐药证据,并且在96周内DTG和DRV/r的安全性概况相对相似。