Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验中,测量了基于家庭的、有技术支持的心脏康复的成本和效益。

The costs and benefits of technology-enabled, home-based cardiac rehabilitation measured in a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Nexus Online Pty Ltd, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Discipline of General Practice, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Oct;20(7):419-22. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14552376.

Abstract

We conducted a cost benefit analysis of a home telehealth-based cardiac rehabilitation programme compared to the standard hospital-based programme. A total of 120 participants were enrolled in a trial, with 60 randomised to the telehealth group and 60 randomised to usual care. Participants in the telehealth group received a mobile phone, Wellness Diary and a Wellness web portal, with daily text messaging. Participants in the usual care group received the standard 6-week hospital-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme, including gym sessions. The cost of delivery by telehealth was slightly lower than for patients attending a rehabilitation service in person. From the provider's perspective, the telehealth intervention could be delivered for $1633 per patient, compared to $1845 for the usual care group. From the participant's perspective, patient travel costs for home rehabilitation were substantially less than for hospital attendance ($80 vs $400). Cardiac rehabilitation by telehealth offers obvious advantages and the option should be available to all patients who are eligible for cardiac rehabilitation.

摘要

我们对基于家庭远程医疗的心脏康复计划与标准医院为基础的计划进行了成本效益分析。共有 120 名参与者参加了一项试验,其中 60 名被随机分配到远程医疗组,60 名被随机分配到常规护理组。远程医疗组的参与者收到一部手机、健康日记和健康门户网站,并每天收到短信。常规护理组的参与者接受了为期 6 周的标准医院门诊心脏康复计划,包括健身房课程。远程医疗的交付成本略低于亲自到康复服务机构就诊的患者。从提供者的角度来看,远程医疗干预的每位患者成本为 1633 美元,而常规护理组为 1845 美元。从参与者的角度来看,家庭康复的患者旅行费用大大低于医院就诊费用(80 美元对 400 美元)。远程医疗心脏康复具有明显的优势,所有符合心脏康复条件的患者都应选择该服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验