Suppr超能文献

门诊环境中的药物治疗管理干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Medication therapy management interventions in outpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):76-87. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5841.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medication therapy management (MTM) services (also called clinical pharmacy services) aim to reduce medication-related problems and their downstream outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of MTM interventions among outpatients with chronic illnesses.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts through January 9, 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers selected studies with comparators and eligible outcomes of ambulatory adults.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Dual review of titles, abstracts, full-text, extractions, risk of bias, and strength of evidence grading. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Medication-related problems, morbidity, mortality, quality of life, health care use, costs, and harms.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence was insufficient to determine the effect of MTM interventions on most evaluated outcomes (eg, drug therapy problems, adverse drug events, disease-specific morbidity, disease-specific or all-cause mortality, and harms). The interventions improved a few measures of medication-related problems and health care use and costs (low strength of evidence) when compared with usual care. Specifically, MTM interventions improved medication appropriateness (4.9 vs 0.9 points on the medication appropriateness index, P < .001), adherence (approximately 4.6%), and percentage of patients achieving a threshold adherence level (odds ratios [ORs] ranged from 0.99 to 5.98) and reduced medication dosing (mean difference, -2.2 doses; 95% CI, -3.738 to -0.662). Medication therapy management interventions reduced health plan expenditures on medication costs, although the studies reported wide CIs. For patients with diabetes mellitus or heart failure, MTM interventions lowered the odds of hospitalization (diabetes: OR, 0.91 to 0.93 based on type of insurance; adjusted hazard rate for heart failure: 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77) and hospitalization costs (mean differences ranged from -$363.45 to -$398.98). The interventions conferred no benefit for patient satisfaction and most measures of health-related quality of life (low strength).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

We graded the evidence as insufficient for most outcomes because of inconsistency and imprecision that stem in part from underlying heterogeneity in populations and interventions. Medication therapy management interventions may reduce the frequency of some medication-related problems, including nonadherence, and lower some health care use and costs, but the evidence is insufficient with respect to improvement in health outcomes.

摘要

重要性

药物治疗管理(MTM)服务(也称为临床药学服务)旨在减少与药物相关的问题及其下游后果。

目的

评估 MTM 干预措施对慢性病门诊患者的效果。

数据来源

通过 2014 年 1 月 9 日的 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和国际药学文摘进行检索。

研究选择

两名评审员选择了有对照和合格结局的门诊成年人研究。

数据提取和综合

对标题、摘要、全文、提取内容、偏倚风险和证据分级进行双重审查。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

主要结果和测量

药物相关问题、发病率、死亡率、生活质量、医疗保健使用、成本和危害。

结果

44 项研究符合纳入标准。由于人群和干预措施的异质性,证据不足,无法确定 MTM 干预措施对大多数评估结果的影响(例如,药物治疗问题、药物不良事件、特定疾病的发病率、特定疾病或全因死亡率和危害)。与常规护理相比,干预措施改善了一些药物相关问题和医疗保健使用和成本的衡量指标(低强度证据)。具体来说,MTM 干预措施提高了药物适宜性(药物适宜性指数增加 4.9 分,而 0.9 分,P <.001)、依从性(约 4.6%)和达到阈值依从水平的患者比例(比值比[OR]范围为 0.99 至 5.98),并减少了药物剂量(平均差异为-2.2 剂量;95%CI,-3.738 至-0.662)。MTM 干预措施降低了健康计划的药物成本支出,尽管研究报告的置信区间较宽。对于患有糖尿病或心力衰竭的患者,MTM 干预措施降低了住院(糖尿病:OR,基于保险类型为 0.91 至 0.93;心力衰竭调整后的危险率为 0.55;95%CI,0.39 至 0.77)和住院费用(平均差异范围为-363.45 美元至-398.98 美元)的几率。干预措施对患者满意度和大多数健康相关生活质量衡量指标(低强度)没有益处。

结论和相关性

由于人群和干预措施的异质性部分导致的结果不一致和不精确,我们将大多数结果的证据评为不足。药物治疗管理干预措施可能会减少一些药物相关问题的发生频率,包括不依从,降低一些医疗保健的使用和成本,但改善健康结果的证据不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验