Peixoto Henry Maia, de Oliveira Maria Regina Fernandes, Romero Gustavo Adolfo Sierra
Center for Tropical Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Mar;20(3):334-52. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12429. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
To evaluate the quality and accuracy of serological diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas.
A systematic review found original studies in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS up to November 2012 and in complementary sources up to February 2013. Studies were evaluated in accordance with QUADAS 2 and STARD parameters and recommended in accordance with GRADE parameters. Meta-analysis was carried out with Meta-DiSc software, using the random-effect model.
Two hundred and eighty-four studies were identified, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria, comprising the final synthesis. All but one was conducted in Brazil, and only two were judged to be of good quality. 15 studies involving immuno-enzymatic tests with crude antigens (cELISA), 11 studies on indirect immunofluorescence tests (IFAT) and three on the immunochromatographic dual-path platform (DPP) test were meta-analysed. The combined results for sensitivity and specificity were cELISA: 0.89 (CI 95% 0.87-0.91) and 0.87 (CI 95% 0.86-0.88); IFAT: 0.88 (CI 95% 0.85-0.91) and 0.63 (CI 95% 0.61-0.65); and DPP: 0.83 (CI 95% 0.78-0.88) and 0.73 (CI 95% 0.70-0.75).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with crude antigens and DPP tests have moderate accuracy for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis, and the quality of the design, implementation and analysis of validation studies on diagnostic tests for this disease urgently require improvement. The recommendation for use of the evaluated tests is based on evidence that is scarce and restricted to Brazil.
评估美洲地区犬内脏利什曼病血清学诊断的质量和准确性。
进行一项系统综述,检索截至2012年11月的MEDLINE、EMBASE和LILACS数据库以及截至2013年2月的补充来源中的原始研究。根据QUADAS 2和STARD参数对研究进行评估,并根据GRADE参数给出推荐意见。使用Meta-DiSc软件采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。
共识别出284项研究,其中25项符合纳入标准,纳入最终综合分析。除一项研究外,所有研究均在巴西进行,仅有两项研究被判定质量良好。对15项涉及粗抗原免疫酶联试验(cELISA)、11项间接免疫荧光试验(IFAT)和3项免疫层析双路径平台(DPP)试验的研究进行了Meta分析。cELISA的敏感性和特异性合并结果分别为:0.89(95%置信区间0.87 - 0.91)和0.87(95%置信区间0.86 - 0.88);IFAT为:0.88(95%置信区间0.85 - 0.91)和0.63(95%置信区间0.61 - 0.65);DPP为:0.83(95%置信区间0.78 - 0.88)和0.73(95%置信区间0.70 - 0.75)。
粗抗原酶联免疫吸附试验和DPP试验对犬内脏利什曼病的诊断具有中等准确性,针对该疾病诊断试验的设计、实施和分析质量迫切需要改进。对所评估试验使用的推荐基于稀缺且仅限于巴西的证据。