Zilberberg Marya D, Shorr Andrew F, Micek Scott T, Vazquez-Guillamet Cristina, Kollef Marin H
EviMed Research Group, LLC, PO Box 303, Goshen, MA, 01032, USA.
University of Massachusetts, PO Box 303, Amherst, MA, USA.
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 21;18(6):596. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0596-8.
The impact of in vitro resistance on initially appropriate antibiotic therapy (IAAT) remains unclear. We elucidated the relationship between non-IAAT and mortality, and between IAAT and multi-drug resistance (MDR) in sepsis due to Gram-negative bacteremia (GNS).
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult intensive care unit patients with bacteremia and severe sepsis/septic shock caused by a gram-negative (GN) organism. We identified the following MDR pathogens: MDR P. aeruginosa, extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing organisms. IAAT was defined as exposure within 24 hours of infection onset to antibiotics active against identified pathogens based on in vitro susceptibility testing. We derived logistic regression models to examine a) predictors of hospital mortality and b) impact of MDR on non-IAAT. Proportions are presented for categorical variables, and median values with interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous.
Out of 1,064 patients with GNS, 351 (29.2%) did not survive hospitalization. Non-survivors were older (66.5 (55, 73.5) versus 63 (53, 72) years, P = 0.036), sicker (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (19 (15, 25) versus 16 (12, 19), P < 0.001), and more likely to be on pressors (odds ratio (OR) 2.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.12 to 3.68), mechanically ventilated (OR 3.06, 95% CI 2.29 to 4.10) have MDR (10.0% versus 4.0%, P < 0.001) and receive non-IAAT (43.4% versus 14.6%, P < 0.001). In a logistic regression model, non-IAAT was an independent predictor of hospital mortality (adjusted OR 3.87, 95% CI 2.77 to 5.41). In a separate model, MDR was strongly associated with the receipt of non-IAAT (adjusted OR 13.05, 95% CI 7.00 to 24.31).
MDR, an important determinant of non-IAAT, is associated with a three-fold increase in the risk of hospital mortality. Given the paucity of therapies to cover GN MDRs, prevention and development of new agents are critical.
体外耐药性对初始恰当抗生素治疗(IAAT)的影响仍不明确。我们阐明了革兰氏阴性菌血症(GNS)所致脓毒症中,非IAAT与死亡率之间以及IAAT与多重耐药(MDR)之间的关系。
我们对成年重症监护病房中由革兰氏阴性(GN)菌引起菌血症及严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。我们确定了以下多重耐药病原体:多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌、产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶的生物体。IAAT定义为在感染发作后24小时内根据体外药敏试验使用对已鉴定病原体有效的抗生素。我们推导了逻辑回归模型以检验:a)医院死亡率的预测因素;b)MDR对非IAAT的影响。分类变量以比例呈现,连续变量以中位数及四分位间距(IQR)呈现。
在1064例GNS患者中,351例(29.2%)未存活至出院。非存活者年龄更大(66.5(55,73.5)岁对63(53,72)岁,P = 0.036)病情更重(急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分II(19(15,25)对16(12,19),P < 0.001),且更可能使用血管活性药物(比值比(OR)2.79,95%置信区间(CI)2.12至3.68)、接受机械通气(OR 3.06,95% CI 2.29至4.10)、存在多重耐药(10.0%对4.0%,P < 0.001)以及接受非IAAT(43.4%对14.6%,P < 0.001)。在逻辑回归模型中,非IAAT是医院死亡率的独立预测因素(校正OR 3.87,95% CI 2.77至5.41)。在另一个模型中,MDR与接受非IAAT密切相关(校正OR 13.05,95% CI 7.oo至24.31)。
MDR是非IAAT的重要决定因素,与医院死亡风险增加三倍相关。鉴于针对革兰氏阴性多重耐药菌的治疗方法匮乏,预防和开发新药物至关重要。