Maddela Raghu, Wahezi Sayed E, Sparr Steven, Brook Allan
Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Pain Physician. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):E761-7.
Interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injections (ic-ESI) are safe and effective treatment options for the management of acute and chronic radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, and other causes of neck pain not responding to more conservative measures. However, the procedure inherently lends itself to possible spinal cord injury (SCI). Though reports of such events have been documented, the clinical presentation of patients with needle puncture SCI varies. In part, this may be due to anatomic considerations, as symptoms may be dependent on the cervical level intruded, as well as the volume and type of injectate used. Many cases go unreported and therefore the true incidence of cord injections during ic-ESI is not known. Cervical epidurals can be performed by the transforaminal or interlaminar approach. It is generally accepted that ic-ESI is safer than transforaminal epidurals. There are numerous reports of arterial invasion or irritation with the latter despite an inherently greater risk of cord puncture with the former. The likelihood of cord interruption rises when ic-ESIs are performed above C6-C7 as there is a relatively slim epidural layer compared to lower cervical epidural zones. Though most cases of devastating outcomes, such as hemiplegia and death, have been reported during cervical transforaminal epidural injections and rarely with ic-ESI, it is important to understand the symptoms and potential pitfalls of performing any cervical epidural injection. Cervical epidural malpractice claims are uncommon, but exceed those of steroid blocks at all the levels combined, demonstrating the need for improved awareness of potential complications in ic-ESI. Here, we will describe an unusual presentation of a spinal cord injection during an ic-ESI procedure.
椎板间颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射(ic-ESI)是治疗急性和慢性神经根病、椎管狭窄以及其他对更保守治疗措施无反应的颈部疼痛病因的安全有效方法。然而,该操作本身存在脊髓损伤(SCI)的可能性。尽管已有此类事件的报告记录,但针刺性脊髓损伤患者的临床表现各不相同。部分原因可能是解剖学因素,因为症状可能取决于穿刺的颈椎节段以及所用注射剂的体积和类型。许多病例未被报告,因此ic-ESI期间脊髓注射的真实发生率尚不清楚。颈椎硬膜外注射可通过经椎间孔或椎板间途径进行。一般认为ic-ESI比经椎间孔硬膜外注射更安全。尽管经椎间孔硬膜外注射脊髓穿刺风险更高,但仍有许多关于后者动脉侵犯或刺激的报告。当在C6-C7以上进行ic-ESI时,脊髓损伤的可能性会增加,因为与下颈椎硬膜外区域相比,硬膜外层相对较薄。尽管大多数严重后果,如偏瘫和死亡,都报告发生在颈椎经椎间孔硬膜外注射期间,而ic-ESI很少出现,但了解任何颈椎硬膜外注射的症状和潜在风险很重要。颈椎硬膜外医疗事故索赔并不常见,但超过了所有部位类固醇阻滞索赔的总和,这表明需要提高对ic-ESI潜在并发症的认识。在此,我们将描述ic-ESI操作过程中脊髓注射的一种不寻常表现。