Argov Z, Steiner I, Soffer D
Department of Neurology, Haddasah University Hospitals, Jerusalem, Israel.
Acta Neurol Scand. 1989 Mar;79(3):243-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03745.x.
The diagnostic yield of sural nerve biopsy was evaluated in 120 peripheral neuropathy patients. In 58 (48%) a final diagnosis was reached without biopsy, while 14 (11.5%) remained undiagnosed. Nerve biopsy contributed to the final diagnosis in 20 of the 53 biopsies (38%). In patients with motor conduction velocity below 30 m/s, sural nerve histology was helpful in 65% of biopsies. In patients with milder reduction in conduction biopsy contributed in only 11%. It is concluded that in general neurological population, nerve biopsy is of limited value as a routine diagnostic procedure. However, in patients with marked slowing of conduction velocity, in whom the diagnosis is not immediately apparent, sural nerve biopsy is indicated.
对120例周围神经病患者评估了腓肠神经活检的诊断价值。58例(48%)患者未经活检即得出最终诊断,而14例(11.5%)仍未确诊。在53例接受活检的患者中,20例(38%)的神经活检对最终诊断有帮助。运动传导速度低于30m/s的患者中,65%的腓肠神经组织学检查有帮助。传导速度降低较轻的患者中,活检仅在11%的病例中有帮助。得出结论,在一般神经科人群中,神经活检作为常规诊断程序价值有限。然而,对于传导速度明显减慢且诊断不明确的患者,建议进行腓肠神经活检。