Suppr超能文献

关于明度错觉的格式塔解释。

A gestalt account of lightness illusions.

作者信息

Gilchrist Alan

出版信息

Perception. 2014;43(9):881-95. doi: 10.1068/p7751.

Abstract

Illusions of lightness offer valuable clues to how lightness values are computed by the visual system. The traditional domain of lightness illusions must be expanded to include failures of constancy, as there is no distinction between these categories. Just as lightness is (relatively) constant in the face of changes in illumination level, so it is equally constant in the face of changes in background reflectance. Simultaneous lightness contrast, the most familiar lightness illusion, is fairly weak, and represents a failure of background-independent lightness constancy. It is argued that a combination of the highest-luminance rule of anchoring plus the Kardos idea of codetermination can account for most lightness illusions. Kardos suggested that the lightness value of a target surface is partly determined relative to the field of illumination (or framework) in which it is embedded, and partly relative to the neighboring field of illumination. Although Kardos did not apply his principle of codetermination to failures of background-independent constancy such as the simultaneous contrast illusion, this can be done rather easily by defining a framework as a perceptual group instead of identifying it strictly with an objective field of illumination.

摘要

明度错觉为视觉系统如何计算明度值提供了有价值的线索。明度错觉的传统范畴必须加以扩展,以纳入恒常性的失效情况,因为这些类别之间并无区别。正如明度在光照水平变化时(相对)保持恒定一样,在背景反射率变化时它同样保持恒定。同时明度对比是最为人熟知的明度错觉,其效应相当微弱,代表了与背景无关的明度恒常性的失效。有人认为,锚定的最高亮度规则与卡尔多斯的共同决定概念相结合,能够解释大多数明度错觉。卡尔多斯提出,目标表面的明度值部分取决于它所嵌入的照明场(或框架),部分取决于相邻的照明场。尽管卡尔多斯并未将其共同决定原则应用于诸如同时对比错觉这类与背景无关的恒常性失效情况,但通过将框架定义为一个感知群组,而非严格地将其与客观照明场等同起来,这一点可以很容易地做到。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验