Buga G M, Gold M E, Wood K S, Chaudhuri G, Ignarro L J
Department of Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine 90024.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1989 Feb 14;161(1):61-72. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90180-5.
A bioassay cascade superfusion procedure was used to compare and contrast the actions of arterial and venous endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) with authentic nitric oxide (NO) on several nonvascular smooth muscle preparations. EDRF was released from human umbilical vein or bovine pulmonary artery by A23187 and allowed to superfuse two nonvascular and one vascular precontracted smooth muscle strips arranged in a cascade. NO or S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine was delivered by superfusion. Both EDRF and NO relaxed bovine trachea, although artery was 10 times more sensitive than trachea to either relaxant. Similarly, rabbit taenia coli and rat fundus relaxed in response to high concentrations of NO or large amounts of EDRF released from umbilical vein. Vascular and nonvascular relaxant responses to both EDRF and NO were inhibited by oxyhemoglobin, methylene blue or superoxide, and were enhanced by superoxide dismutase. Perfusion of pulmonary artery or umbilical vein with A23187 resulted in contraction of guinea pig ileum and relaxation of pulmonary artery, whereas NO relaxed both preparations. Oxyhemoglobin enhanced the contractile and abolished the relaxant responses. Thus, ileum is more sensitive to endothelium-derived contracting factor(s) than to EDRF. NO raised cyclic GMP levels in all smooth muscle preparations, but a greater fold increase was observed in artery than in nonvascular smooth muscle. EDRF released from human umbilical vein was identified chemically as NO or a nitroso compound, as was done previously for EDRF from bovine pulmonary artery and vein. These observations support the view that one EDRF from artery and vein is NO or a labile nitroso compound.
采用生物测定级联灌流程序,比较和对比动脉和静脉内皮衍生舒张因子(EDRF)与一氧化氮(NO)对几种非血管平滑肌制剂的作用。通过A23187从人脐静脉或牛肺动脉释放EDRF,并使其灌流以级联方式排列的两条非血管和一条血管预收缩平滑肌条。通过灌流给予NO或S-亚硝基-N-乙酰青霉胺。EDRF和NO均可使牛气管舒张,尽管动脉对任何一种舒张剂的敏感性比气管高10倍。同样,兔结肠带和大鼠胃底对高浓度NO或从脐静脉释放的大量EDRF有反应而舒张。对EDRF和NO的血管和非血管舒张反应均被氧合血红蛋白、亚甲蓝或超氧化物抑制,并被超氧化物歧化酶增强。用A23187灌流肺动脉或脐静脉导致豚鼠回肠收缩和肺动脉舒张,而NO使两种制剂均舒张。氧合血红蛋白增强收缩反应并消除舒张反应。因此,回肠对内皮衍生收缩因子比对EDRF更敏感。NO使所有平滑肌制剂中的环鸟苷酸水平升高,但在动脉中观察到的升高倍数比在非血管平滑肌中更大。从人脐静脉释放的EDRF经化学鉴定为NO或亚硝基化合物,正如先前对牛肺动脉和静脉中的EDRF所做的那样。这些观察结果支持这样一种观点,即来自动脉和静脉的一种EDRF是NO或一种不稳定的亚硝基化合物。