Ritz Stacey A, Beatty Kathleen, Ellaway Rachel H
Medical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 May-Aug;27(2):152-7. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.143747.
The concept of the social accountability of medical schools has garnered many followers, in response to a broad desire for greater social justice in health care. As its use has spread, the term 'social accountability' has become a meta-narrative for social justice and an inevitable and unquestionable good, while at the same time becoming increasingly ambiguous in its meaning and intent. In this article, we use the lenses of postmodernism and critical reflexivity to unpack the multiple meanings of social accountability. In our view, subjecting the concept of 'social accountability' to critique will enhance the ability to appraise the ways in which it is understood and enacted.
We contend that critical reflexivity is necessary for social accountability to achieve its aspirations, and hence we must be prepared to become accountable not only for our actions, but also for the ideologies and discourses underlying them.
医学院校社会问责制的概念已赢得众多追随者,以回应医疗保健领域对更大社会正义的广泛诉求。随着其应用的传播,“社会问责制”一词已成为社会正义的元叙事以及一种不可避免且无可置疑的善,与此同时,其含义和意图却愈发模糊。在本文中,我们运用后现代主义和批判性反思的视角来剖析社会问责制的多重含义。我们认为,对“社会问责制”概念进行批判将增强评估其理解和实施方式的能力。
我们认为批判性反思对于社会问责制实现其目标而言是必要的,因此我们不仅必须为自己的行为负责,还必须为行为背后的意识形态和话语负责。