Suppr超能文献

柱状薄膜技术与真空金属沉积技术在无孔基材上显现皮脂指纹的比较。

Comparison of the columnar-thin-film and vacuum-metal-deposition techniques to develop sebaceous fingermarks on nonporous substrates.

作者信息

Williams Stephanie F, Pulsifer Drew P, Shaler Robert C, Ramotowski Robert S, Brazelle Shelly, Lakhtakia Akhlesh

机构信息

Forensic Science Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2015 Mar;60(2):295-302. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12648. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Abstract

Both the columnar-thin-film (CTF) and the vacuum-metal-deposition (VMD) techniques for visualizing sebaceous fingermarks require the deposition of a material thereon in a vacuum chamber. Despite that similarity, there are many differences between the two techniques. The film deposited with the CTF technique has a columnar morphology, but the film deposited with the VMD technique comprises discrete islands. A split-print methodology on a variety of fingermarked substrates was used to determine that the CTF technique is superior for developing fingermarks on clear sandwich bags and partial bloody fingermarks on stainless steel. Both techniques are similar in their ability to develop fingermarks on glass but the CTF technique yields higher contrast. The VMD technique is superior for developing fingermarks on white grocery bags and the smooth side of Gloss Finish Scotch Multitask(™) tape. Neither technique worked well for fingermarks on black garbage bags.

摘要

用于可视化皮脂腺指纹的柱状薄膜(CTF)技术和真空金属沉积(VMD)技术都需要在真空室内在其上沉积一种材料。尽管有这种相似性,但这两种技术之间存在许多差异。用CTF技术沉积的薄膜具有柱状形态,但用VMD技术沉积的薄膜由离散的岛状物组成。采用一种在各种留有指纹的基材上的分裂指纹方法来确定,CTF技术在显影透明三明治袋上的指纹和不锈钢上的部分带血指纹方面更具优势。两种技术在显影玻璃上的指纹方面能力相似,但CTF技术产生的对比度更高。VMD技术在显影白色食品杂货袋和光面思高多功能(™)胶带光滑面上的指纹方面更具优势。两种技术在处理黑色垃圾袋上的指纹时效果都不佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验