Becker Jeroen H, Krikhaar Anniek, Schuit Ewoud, Mårtendal Annika, Maršál Karel, Kwee Anneke, Visser Gerard H A, Amer-Wåhlin Isis
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, the Netherlands.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Feb;94(2):175-82. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12548. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
To study the predictive value of biphasic ST-events for interventions for suspected fetal distress and adverse neonatal outcome, when using ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Prospective cohort study.
Three academic hospitals in Sweden.
Women in labor with a high-risk singleton fetus in cephalic position beyond 36 weeks of gestation.
In women in labor who were monitored with conventional cardiotocography, ST-waveform analysis was recorded and concealed. Traces with biphasic ST-events of the FECG (index) were compared with traces without biphasic events of the FECG. The ability of biphasic events to predict interventions for suspected fetal distress and adverse outcome was assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Interventions for suspected fetal distress and adverse outcome (defined as presence of metabolic acidosis (i.e. umbilical cord pH <7.05 and base deficit in extracellular fluid >12 mmol), umbilical cord pH <7.00, 5-min Apgar score <7, admittance to neonatal intensive care unit or perinatal death).
Although the presence of biphasic events of the FECG was associated with more interventions for fetal distress and an increased risk of adverse outcome compared with cases with no biphasic events, the presence of significant (i.e. intervention advised according to cardiotocography interpretation) biphasic events showed no independent association with interventions for fetal distress [odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-4.50] or adverse outcome (OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.74-5.24).
The presence of significant biphasic events did not discriminate in the prediction of interventions for fetal distress or adverse outcome. Therefore, biphasic events in relation to ST-analysis monitoring during birth should be omitted if future studies confirm our findings.
在产时胎儿监护中使用胎儿心电图(FECG)的ST段分析时,研究双相ST段事件对疑似胎儿窘迫干预措施及不良新生儿结局的预测价值。
前瞻性队列研究。
瑞典的三家学术医院。
妊娠36周后单胎头位高危孕妇。
对接受常规胎心监护的产妇记录并隐匿ST段波形分析。将FECG出现双相ST段事件(指标)的记录与未出现双相事件的记录进行比较。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估双相事件预测疑似胎儿窘迫干预措施及不良结局的能力。
对疑似胎儿窘迫的干预措施及不良结局(定义为存在代谢性酸中毒(即脐动脉血pH<7.05且细胞外液碱缺失>12 mmol)、脐动脉血pH<7.00、5分钟Apgar评分<7、入住新生儿重症监护病房或围产期死亡)。
尽管与未出现双相事件的病例相比,FECG出现双相事件与更多的胎儿窘迫干预措施及不良结局风险增加相关,但显著的(即根据胎心监护解读建议进行干预)双相事件与胎儿窘迫干预措施[比值比(OR)1.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.65 - 4.50]或不良结局(OR 1.96,95% CI 0.74 - 5.24)无独立相关性。
显著双相事件在预测胎儿窘迫干预措施或不良结局方面无鉴别作用。因此,如果未来研究证实我们的发现,在分娩期间与ST段分析监测相关的双相事件应予以忽略。