Keehn Aryeh, Maiman Richard, Agalliu Ilir, Taylor Jacob, Ghavamian Reza
Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, New York.
J Endourol. 2015 Jun;29(6):691-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0484. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
To analyze the perioperative outcomes and management considerations in patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC).
There were 224 consecutive laparoscopic radical nephrectomies reviewed. Of those, 37 patients with ESRD were identified and compared with 187 patients with sporadic RCC. Evaluable parameters included age, sex, race, side of surgery, medical comorbidities, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scoring, and age adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index. All complications occurring intraoperatively and within the first 30 days were classified as per the Clavien classification system. Presurgical workup and transplant considerations were evaluated. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using Student t tests and chi-square tests for categoric variables.
Compared with non-ESRD patients, those with ESRD were younger and had smaller tumors. ASA was significantly higher in the ESRD group (P<0.001). Mean blood loss was similar between ESRD patients and non-ESRD patients. Overall complication rates were higher in patients with ESRD. Pathologic characteristics of ESRD renal masses included a higher proportion of papillary RCC.
Patients with RCC associated with ESRD tend to have a higher ASA class and lower grade tumors. In addition, this population is at increased risk of surgical complications and more likely to need transfusions. Careful preoperative preparation and intraoperative anesthetic management are crucial to minimize patient morbidity and improve outcomes.
分析依赖透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者接受腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)的围手术期结局及管理要点。
回顾了连续224例腹腔镜根治性肾切除术病例。其中,识别出37例ESRD患者,并与187例散发性RCC患者进行比较。可评估参数包括年龄、性别、种族、手术侧别、合并症、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分以及年龄校正的Charlson合并症指数。术中及术后30天内发生的所有并发症均按照Clavien分类系统进行分类。评估术前检查及移植相关考虑因素。使用学生t检验和卡方检验对分类变量的人口统计学和临床特征进行比较。
与非ESRD患者相比,ESRD患者更年轻,肿瘤更小。ESRD组的ASA评分显著更高(P<0.001)。ESRD患者和非ESRD患者的平均失血量相似。ESRD患者的总体并发症发生率更高。ESRD肾肿块的病理特征包括乳头状RCC的比例更高。
合并ESRD的RCC患者往往ASA分级更高,肿瘤分级更低。此外,该人群手术并发症风险增加,更可能需要输血。仔细的术前准备和术中麻醉管理对于将患者发病率降至最低并改善结局至关重要。