Calkwood Jonathan, Cree Bruce, Crayton Heidi, Kantor Daniel, Steingo Brian, Barbato Luigi, Hashmonay Ron, Agashivala Neetu, McCague Kevin, Tenenbaum Nadia, Edwards Keith
Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Golden Valley, MN, USA.
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
BMC Neurol. 2014 Nov 26;14:220. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0220-1.
The Evaluate Patient OutComes (EPOC) study assessed physician- and patient-reported outcomes in individuals with relapsing multiple sclerosis who switched directly from injectable disease-modifying therapy (iDMT; glatiramer acetate, intramuscular or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a, or interferon beta-1b) to once-daily, oral fingolimod. Post hoc analyses evaluated the impact of a switch to fingolimod versus staying on each of the four individual iDMTs.
Overall, 1053 patients were randomized 3:1 to switch to fingolimod or remain on iDMT. The primary endpoint was the change in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Global Satisfaction score. Secondary endpoints included changes in scores for TSQM Effectiveness, Side Effects and Convenience subscales, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Patient-Reported Outcome Indices for Multiple Sclerosis (PRIMUS) Activities, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and mean investigator-reported Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement (CGI-I). All outcomes were evaluated after 6 months of treatment.
Changes in TSQM Global Satisfaction scores were superior after a switch to fingolimod when compared with scores in patients remaining on any of the iDMTs (all p <0.001). Likewise, all TSQM subscale scores improved following a switch to fingolimod (all p <0.001), except when compared with glatiramer acetate for the TSQM Side Effects subscale (p = 0.111). FSS scores were found to be superior for fingolimod versus remaining on subcutaneous interferon beta-1a and interferon beta-1b, BDI-II scores were significantly improved for fingolimod except for the comparison with intramuscular interferon beta-1a, and SF-36 scores were superior with fingolimod compared with remaining on interferon beta-1b (MCS and PCS; p = 0.030 and p = 0.022, respectively) and subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (PCS only; p = 0.024). Mean CGI-I scores were superior with fingolimod when compared with continuing treatment with any of the iDMTs (all p <0.001).
After 6 months, a switch to fingolimod showed superiority compared with remaining on each iDMT for a range of patient- and physician-reported outcomes, including global satisfaction with treatment.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01216072 .
评估患者结局(EPOC)研究评估了从注射用疾病修正治疗(iDMT;醋酸格拉替雷、肌肉注射或皮下注射干扰素β-1a或干扰素β-1b)直接转换为每日一次口服芬戈莫德的复发型多发性硬化症患者的医生报告结局和患者报告结局。事后分析评估了转换为芬戈莫德与继续使用四种iDMT中的每一种相比的影响。
总共1053例患者按3:1随机分组,分别转换为芬戈莫德或继续使用iDMT。主要终点是药物治疗满意度问卷(TSQM)总体满意度得分的变化。次要终点包括TSQM有效性、副作用和便利性子量表得分的变化、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)、多发性硬化症患者报告结局指数(PRIMUS)活动、36项简明健康调查(SF-36)心理成分总结(MCS)和身体成分总结(PCS)以及研究者报告的平均临床总体改善印象(CGI-I)。所有结局在治疗6个月后进行评估。
与继续使用任何一种iDMT的患者得分相比,转换为芬戈莫德后TSQM总体满意度得分的变化更优(所有p<0.001)。同样,转换为芬戈莫德后所有TSQM子量表得分均有所改善(所有p<0.001),但TSQM副作用子量表与醋酸格拉替雷相比除外(p = 0.111)。发现芬戈莫德的FSS得分优于继续使用皮下注射干扰素β-1a和干扰素β-1b,芬戈莫德的BDI-II得分显著改善,但与肌肉注射干扰素β-1a相比除外,芬戈莫德的SF-36得分优于继续使用干扰素β-1b(MCS和PCS;分别为p = 0.030和p = 0.022)和皮下注射干扰素β-1a(仅PCS;p = 0.024)。与继续使用任何一种iDMT治疗相比,芬戈莫德的平均CGI-I得分更优(所有p<0.001)。
6个月后,与继续使用每种iDMT相比,转换为芬戈莫德在一系列患者和医生报告的结局方面显示出优越性,包括对治疗的总体满意度。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01216072 。