• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DISPARITY-II研究:重症脓毒症或脓毒性休克女性患者抗生素给药延迟情况

The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock.

作者信息

Madsen Tracy E, Napoli Anthony M

机构信息

Division of Women's Health in Emergency Care, Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI; Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1499-502. doi: 10.1111/acem.12546. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/acem.12546
PMID:25424151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early antibiotics reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Recent work demonstrated that women experience greater delays to antibiotic administration, but it is unknown if this relationship remains after adjusting for factors such as source of infection.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to investigate whether gender and/or source of infection are associated with delays to antibiotics in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study in an urban academic emergency department and national Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) database study site. Consecutive patients age 18 years and older admitted to intensive care with severe sepsis or septic shock and entered into the SSC database from October 2005 to March 2012 were included. Two trained research assistants, blinded to the primary outcome, used a standardized abstraction form to obtain patient demographic and clinical data, including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and comorbidities. Time to first antibiotic and presumed source of infection were extracted from the SSC database. Univariate analyses were performed with Pearson chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression was performed with time to first antibiotic as the primary outcome. Covariates, chosen a priori by study authors, included age, race, ethnicity, source of infection, SOFA score, and lactate.

RESULTS

A total of 771 patients were included. Women were 45.3% of the sample, the mean age was 66 years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.1 to 67.5 years), 19.4% were nonwhite, and 8% were Hispanic. Mean time to first antibiotic was 153 minutes (95% CI = 143 to 163 minutes) for men and 184 minutes (95% CI = 171 to 197 minutes) for women (p < 0.001). The urinary tract was source of infection for 35.2% of women (95% CI = 30.2% to 40.3%) versus 23.7% (95% CI = 19.6% to 27.8%) of men. Pneumonia was present in 46.9% of men (95% CI = 42.1% to 51.7%) versus 35.8% (95% CI = 30.8% to 40.8%) of women. The mean time to antibiotics in women was longer than in men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.30), even after adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, presumed source of infection, SOFA score, and lactate (p = 0.001). Those with pneumonia compared to other infections received antibiotics faster (aOR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.81). There was no significant association between other sources of infection and time to antibiotics in either univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Women experience longer delays to initial antibiotics among patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, even after adjusting for infectious source. Pneumonia was associated with shorter times to antibiotic administration. Future research is necessary to investigate contributors to delayed antibiotic administration in women.

摘要

背景

早期使用抗生素可降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。近期研究表明,女性在抗生素使用上的延迟时间更长,但在调整感染源等因素后,这种关系是否依然存在尚不清楚。

目的

研究性别和/或感染源是否与严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者使用抗生素的延迟时间有关。

方法

这是一项在城市学术急诊科及全国脓毒症存活行动(SSC)数据库研究点开展的回顾性观察性研究。纳入2005年10月至2012年3月期间因严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克入住重症监护病房并录入SSC数据库的18岁及以上连续患者。两名经过培训的研究助理在对主要结局不知情的情况下,使用标准化摘要表获取患者的人口统计学和临床数据,包括序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分及合并症。首次使用抗生素的时间及推测的感染源从SSC数据库中提取。采用Pearson卡方检验和t检验进行单因素分析。以首次使用抗生素的时间作为主要结局进行线性回归分析。研究作者预先选定的协变量包括年龄、种族、民族、感染源、SOFA评分和乳酸水平。

结果

共纳入771例患者。女性占样本的45.3%,平均年龄为66岁(95%置信区间[CI]=65.1至67.5岁),19.4%为非白人,8%为西班牙裔。男性首次使用抗生素的平均时间为153分钟(95%CI=143至163分钟),女性为184分钟(95%CI=171至197分钟)(p<0.001)。女性中有35.2%(95%CI=30.2%至40.3%)的感染源为泌尿系统,而男性为23.7%(95%CI=19.6%至27.8%)。男性中有46.9%(95%CI=42.1%至51.7%)患有肺炎,女性为35.8%(95%CI=30.8%至40.8%)。即使在调整了年龄、种族、民族推测的感染源、SOFA评分和乳酸水平后,女性使用抗生素的平均时间仍长于男性(调整后的优势比[aOR]=1.18,95%CI=1.07至1.30)(p=0.001)。与其他感染相比,患有肺炎的患者使用抗生素更快(aOR=0.73,95%CI=0.66至0.81)。在单因素或多因素分析中,其他感染源与使用抗生素的时间之间均无显著关联。

结论

即使在调整感染源后严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者中,女性在初始使用抗生素时的延迟时间更长。肺炎与抗生素使用时间较短有关。有必要开展进一步研究以探究导致女性抗生素使用延迟的因素。

相似文献

1
The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock.DISPARITY-II研究:重症脓毒症或脓毒性休克女性患者抗生素给药延迟情况
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1499-502. doi: 10.1111/acem.12546. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
2
Analysis of Race and Time to Antibiotics Among Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的种族与抗生素使用时间分析。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Aug;4(4):680-686. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0271-7. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
3
The DISPARITY Study: do gender differences exist in Surviving Sepsis Campaign resuscitation bundle completion, completion of individual bundle elements, or sepsis mortality?差异研究:在脓毒症存活行动复苏集束完成情况、各个集束要素的完成情况或脓毒症死亡率方面是否存在性别差异?
J Crit Care. 2014 Jun;29(3):473.e7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
4
Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.急诊科收治的脓毒症患者延迟使用第二剂抗生素:患病率、危险因素及结局
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):956-965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002377.
5
Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program.经验性抗生素治疗从第一小时起即可降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的死亡率:基于指南的绩效改进项目结果
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1749-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000330.
6
Delayed Administration of Antibiotics Beyond the First Hour of Recognition Is Associated with Increased Mortality Rates in Children with Sepsis/Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.延迟给予抗生素超过发病后 1 小时与脓毒症/严重脓毒症和感染性休克患儿的死亡率增加相关。
J Pediatr. 2021 Jun;233:183-190.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.12.035. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
7
Does Early and Appropriate Antibiotic Administration Improve Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock?早期合理使用抗生素能否改善急诊科严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的死亡率?
J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):588-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
8
Effective antibiotic treatment prescribed by emergency physicians in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock: where is the gap?急诊医生为入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者开具的有效抗生素治疗:差距在哪里?
J Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;41(6):573-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.10.024. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
9
The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗生素使用时机对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克预后的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1907-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142.
10
Antibiotic Timing and Progression to Septic Shock Among Patients in the ED With Suspected Infection.急诊疑似感染患者抗生素时机与脓毒性休克进展。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.029. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis Presentation, Interventions, and Outcome Differences Among Men and Women in the Emergency Department.急诊科中男性和女性脓毒症的表现、干预措施及结局差异
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 11;26(4):880-887. doi: 10.5811/westjem.40005.
2
Social Determinants of Sepsis Mortality in the United States: A Retrospective, Epidemiologic Analysis.美国脓毒症死亡率的社会决定因素:一项回顾性流行病学分析
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 20:2024.12.19.24319343. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.19.24319343.
3
Factors and outcomes associated with under- and overdiagnosis of sepsis in the first hour of emergency department care.
急诊科护理首小时内脓毒症诊断不足与过度诊断相关的因素及结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):204-215. doi: 10.1111/acem.15074. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
4
Sex differences in in-hospital management in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective multicenter observational study.脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者住院期间管理的性别差异:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 28;14(1):4900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55421-x.
5
Female Sex and Mortality in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.女性性别与金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0473.
6
Influence of gender on age-associated in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.性别对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者与年龄相关的院内死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性全国多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 11;27(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04515-5.
7
Gender awareness is also nurses' business: Measuring sensitivity and role ideology towards patients.性别意识也是护士的工作:测量对患者的敏感性和角色观念。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):4409-4418. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13866. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
8
Sex and Gender Differences in Bacterial Infections.细菌感染中的性别差异。
Infect Immun. 2022 Oct 20;90(10):e0028322. doi: 10.1128/iai.00283-22. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
9
Sex and gender differences in community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎中的性别差异。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;17(6):1575-1588. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-02999-7. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Gender-Specific Differences in the Intensive Care Treatment of COVID-19 Patients.新冠病毒肺炎患者重症监护治疗中的性别差异
J Pers Med. 2022 May 23;12(5):849. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050849.