Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Oncology. 2014;87 Suppl 1:55-62. doi: 10.1159/000368146. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the combination guidance of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and fusion imaging in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with poor conspicuity on B-mode US and CEUS/fusion imaging.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study, which included 356 patients with 556 HCCs that were inconspicuous on B-mode US. A total of 192 patients with 344 HCCs, 123 patients with 155 HCCs, and 37 patients with 57 HCCs underwent RFA under CEUS guidance, fusion imaging guidance, and the combination of CEUS and fusion imaging guidance.
The average number of treatment sessions was 1.1 (range: 1-2) in the CEUS guidance group, 1.1 (range: 1-2) in the fusion imaging guidance group, and 1.1 (range: 1-3) in the combination of CEUS and fusion imaging guidance group. Treatment analysis did not reveal significantly more RFA treatment sessions in the combination guidance group than in the other groups (p = 0.97, Student's t test). During the follow-up period (1.1-85.3 months, mean ± SD, 43.2 ± 59.5), the 3-year local tumor progression rates were 4.9, 7.2, and 5.9% in the CEUS guidance group, the fusion imaging guidance group, and the combination guidance group, respectively (p = 0.84, log-rank test).
In spite of selection bias, session frequency and local tumor progression were not different under the combination guidance with CEUS and fusion imaging in RFA. The combination of fusion imaging and CEUS guidance in RFA therapy is an effective treatment for HCC with poor conspicuity on B-mode US and CEUS/fusion imaging.
本研究旨在评估对比增强超声(CEUS)与融合成像联合引导在 B 型超声和 CEUS/融合成像不显影的肝细胞癌(HCC)射频消融(RFA)中的应用价值。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 356 例 556 个 B 型超声不显影的 HCC 患者。其中 192 例 344 个 HCC、123 例 155 个 HCC 和 37 例 57 个 HCC 分别在 CEUS 引导、融合成像引导和 CEUS 与融合成像联合引导下行 RFA。
CEUS 引导组、融合成像引导组和 CEUS 与融合成像联合引导组的平均治疗次数分别为 1.1(范围:1-2)次、1.1(范围:1-2)次和 1.1(范围:1-3)次。治疗分析显示,联合引导组的 RFA 治疗次数与其他两组无显著差异(p = 0.97,Student's t 检验)。在随访期间(1.1-85.3 个月,平均±标准差,43.2±59.5),CEUS 引导组、融合成像引导组和联合引导组的 3 年局部肿瘤进展率分别为 4.9%、7.2%和 5.9%(p = 0.84,对数秩检验)。
尽管存在选择偏倚,但在 RFA 中联合使用 CEUS 和融合成像引导并不会改变治疗次数和局部肿瘤进展率。在 B 型超声和 CEUS/融合成像不显影的 HCC 患者的 RFA 治疗中,融合成像与 CEUS 引导联合应用是一种有效的治疗方法。