Lamont Elizabeth B, Schilsky Richard L, He Yulei, Muss Hyman, Cohen Harvey Jay, Hurria Arti, Meilleur Ashley, Kindler Hedy L, Venook Alan, Lilenbaum Rogerio, Niell Harvey, Goldberg Richard M, Joffe Steven
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA (EL); Departments of Medicine, and Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (EL, YH, AM); American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA (RLS); Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (HM); Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (HJC); City of Hope, Duarte, CA (AH); Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (HLK); Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (AV); Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (RL); Department of Medicine, the University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN (HN); Department of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (RMG); Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (SJ).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Nov 27;107(1):336. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju336. Print 2015 Jan.
In the United States, patients who enroll in chemotherapy trials seldom reflect the attributes of the general population with cancer, as they are often younger, more functional, and have less comorbidity. We compared survival following three chemotherapy regimens according to the setting in which care was delivered (ie, clinical trial vs usual care) to determine the generalizability of clinical trial results to unselected elderly Medicare patients.
Using SEER-Medicare data, we estimated survival for elderly patients (ie, age 65 years or older, n = 14097) with advanced pancreatic or lung cancer following receipt of one of three guideline-recommended first-line chemotherapy regimens. We compared their survival to that of similarly treated clinical trial enrollees, without age restrictions, with the same diagnosis and stage (n = 937). All statistical tests were two-sided.
Trial patients were 9.5 years younger than elderly Medicare patients. Medicare patients were more often white and tended to live in areas of greater educational attainment than trial enrollees. For each tumor type, Medicare patients who were 75 years or older had median survivals that were six to eight weeks shorter than those of trial patients (4.3 vs 5.8 months following treatment with single agent gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer, P = .03; 7.3 vs 8.9 months following treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, P = .91; 8.2 vs 10.2 months following treatment with CDDP/ VP16 for extensive stage small cell lung cancer, P ≤ .01), whereas younger Medicare patients had survival times that were similar to those of trial patients.
Results of clinical trials for advanced pancreatic cancer and lung cancers tended to correctly estimate survival for Medicare patients aged 65 to 74 years, but to overestimate survival for older Medicare patients by six to eight weeks. These estimates of Medicare patients' survival may aid subsequent patients and their oncologists in treatment decision-making.
在美国,参加化疗试验的患者很少能反映出癌症普通人群的特征,因为他们往往更年轻、功能更好且合并症更少。我们根据治疗环境(即临床试验与常规治疗)比较了三种化疗方案后的生存率,以确定临床试验结果对未经过挑选的老年医疗保险患者的可推广性。
利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保数据,我们估计了患有晚期胰腺癌或肺癌的老年患者(即65岁及以上,n = 14097)在接受三种指南推荐的一线化疗方案之一后的生存率。我们将他们的生存率与年龄无限制、诊断和分期相同的类似治疗的临床试验参与者(n = 937)的生存率进行了比较。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
试验患者比老年医疗保险患者年轻9.5岁。医疗保险患者比试验参与者更常为白人,且往往居住在教育程度更高的地区。对于每种肿瘤类型,75岁及以上的医疗保险患者的中位生存期比试验患者短6至8周(晚期胰腺癌单药吉西他滨治疗后分别为4.3个月和5.8个月,P = 0.03;IV期非小细胞肺癌卡铂和紫杉醇治疗后分别为7.3个月和8.9个月,P = 0.91;广泛期小细胞肺癌顺铂/依托泊苷治疗后分别为8.2个月和10.2个月,P≤0.01),而较年轻的医疗保险患者的生存时间与试验患者相似。
晚期胰腺癌和肺癌的临床试验结果往往能正确估计65至74岁医疗保险患者的生存率,但高估了老年医疗保险患者6至8周的生存率。这些对医疗保险患者生存率的估计可能有助于后续患者及其肿瘤学家进行治疗决策。