文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

与传统培养箱相比,封闭系统培养胚胎在优质胚胎数量方面没有优势:一项 RCT 的结果。

No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):268-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu316. Epub 2014 Nov 28.


DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu316
PMID:25432920
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does culture in a closed system result in an increased number of good quality embryos (GQE) on Day 2 compared with culture in a conventional system? SUMMARY ANSWER: Culture in a closed system up to 2 days after microinjection results in similar embryo development and morphological quality compared with culture in a conventional incubation system. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Time-lapse imaging (TLI) incubators are rapidly being introduced into IVF laboratories worldwide, despite the lack of large prospective randomized trials demonstrating improvement in embryo development or pregnancy rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomized controlled trial including 364 patients (365 cycles) was conducted between May 2010 and February 2014. After oocyte collection, randomization was carried out and all of a patients' oocytes were allocated to culture in either a conventional incubator or a closed incubator system in proportion 1:2 until embryo transfer on Day 2. A total of 1979 oocytes were injected and cultured in the closed system, and 1000 in the standard incubator. The primary end-point was the number of GQE in the two groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: In total, 364 patients undergoing their first IVF cycle using ICSI, where at least one oocyte was retrieved, were randomized in a university hospital setting. Two hundred and forty patients were randomized for culture in a closed system and 124 patients for culture in the conventional incubator system (control group). Embryo assessments and final morphological scoring before transfer and cryopreservation were carried out at the same time points for embryos cultured in the conventional incubator and in the closed system. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no significant difference in the mean ± SD number of GQEs between groups: 2.41 ± 2.27 for the closed system group and 2.19 ± 1.82 for the control group (P = 0.34, difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.69; -0.24). No significant differences were found in the number of 4-cell embryos, implantation-, pregnancy- or ongoing pregnancy rates. A significantly higher miscarriage rate was found in the TLI group compared with the control group (33.3 and 10.2%, P = 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Culture media, temperature and gas levels were similar in the open and closed incubator systems, but different culture dishes were used. Culturing embryos for longer time period (to the blastocyst stage) may give different results. Only ICSI patients were included, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Finally, the number of GQEs on Day 2 was used as a surrogate outcome for live birth. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results are consistent with other, smaller randomized trials showing no difference in embryo quality when comparing culture in a conventional incubator with that of a closed TLI incubator system.

摘要

研究问题:与传统培养系统相比,在封闭系统中培养是否会导致第 2 天的优质胚胎(GQE)数量增加?

总结答案:与传统孵育系统相比,微注射后 2 天内的封闭系统培养导致胚胎发育和形态质量相似。

已知情况:尽管缺乏大型前瞻性随机试验证明胚胎发育或妊娠率的改善,但时间延迟成像(TLI)培养箱正在全球范围内迅速引入 IVF 实验室。

研究设计、大小、持续时间:这是一项包括 364 名患者(365 个周期)的随机对照试验,于 2010 年 5 月至 2014 年 2 月进行。在卵母细胞采集后,进行随机分组,患者的所有卵母细胞按 1:2 的比例分配到传统培养箱或封闭培养箱系统中培养,直到第 2 天进行胚胎移植。共有 1979 个卵母细胞在封闭系统中进行了注射和培养,1000 个在标准培养箱中进行了培养。主要终点是两组的 GQE 数量。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:在一家大学医院环境中,共有 364 名接受首次使用 ICSI 的患者接受了随机分组,这些患者至少有一个卵母细胞被取出。240 名患者被随机分配到封闭系统中培养,124 名患者被分配到传统培养箱系统(对照组)中培养。在传统培养箱和封闭系统中培养的胚胎在相同的时间点进行胚胎评估和最终形态评分,然后进行转移和冷冻保存。

主要结果和机会的作用:两组的 GQE 平均值差异无统计学意义:封闭系统组为 2.41±2.27,对照组为 2.19±1.82(P=0.34,差异 0.23,95%置信区间 0.69;-0.24)。4 细胞胚胎数量、着床率、妊娠率或持续妊娠率无显著差异。与对照组相比,TLI 组的流产率显著升高(33.3%和 10.2%,P=0.01)。

局限性、谨慎的原因:开放和封闭培养箱系统中的培养介质、温度和气体水平相似,但使用了不同的培养皿。培养胚胎的时间更长(到囊胚阶段)可能会产生不同的结果。仅纳入了接受 ICSI 的患者,这可能限制了结果的普遍性。最后,第 2 天的 GQE 数量被用作活产的替代结果。

研究结果的更广泛意义:这些结果与其他较小的随机试验一致,表明在比较传统培养箱和封闭的 TLI 培养箱系统时,胚胎质量没有差异。

相似文献

[1]
No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT.

Hum Reprod. 2014-11-28

[2]
Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Hum Reprod. 2013-6-11

[3]
Semi-automated morphometric analysis of human embryos can reveal correlations between total embryo volume and clinical pregnancy.

Hum Reprod. 2013-1-12

[4]
In vitro maturation is associated with increased early embryo arrest without impairing morphokinetic development of useable embryos progressing to blastocysts.

Hum Reprod. 2015-6-3

[5]
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.

Hum Reprod. 2014-12-19

[6]
Randomized controlled trial comparing embryo culture in two incubator systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope.

Fertil Steril. 2017-11-23

[7]
Pregnancy rates of day 4 and day 5 embryos after culture in an integrated time-lapse incubator.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017-5-8

[8]
Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope.

Fertil Steril. 2014-9-11

[9]
The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age.

Hum Reprod. 2017-1

[10]
Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

Hum Reprod. 2018-5-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Impact of Time-Lapse Incubator Systems on Fertilization, Blastocyst Development, and Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes.

J Reprod Infertil. 2024

[2]
Comparison of DNA methylation profiles of human embryos cultured in either uninterrupted or interrupted incubators.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023-1

[3]
Change in the Strategy of Embryo Selection with Time-Lapse System Implementation-Impact on Clinical Pregnancy Rates.

J Clin Med. 2021-9-12

[4]
Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021-5

[5]
The clinical use of time-lapse in human-assisted reproduction.

Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2020-12-7

[6]
Comparing transcriptome profiles of human embryo cultured in closed and standard incubators.

PeerJ. 2020-8-11

[7]
Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Hum Reprod Open. 2020-3-19

[8]
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-5-29

[9]
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-25

[10]
Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

PLoS One. 2017-6-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索