Suppr超能文献

产后出血期间失血量的测量。

Measurement of blood loss during postpartum haemorrhage.

作者信息

Lilley G, Burkett-St-Laurent D, Precious E, Bruynseels D, Kaye A, Sanders J, Alikhan R, Collins P W, Hall J E, Collis R E

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Control, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, UK.

Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Control, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, UK.

出版信息

Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Feb;24(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We set out to validate the accuracy of gravimetric quantification of blood loss during simulated major postpartum haemorrhage and to evaluate the technique in a consecutive cohort of women experiencing major postpartum haemorrhage. The study took part in a large UK delivery suite over a one-year period. All women who experienced major postpartum haemorrhage were eligible for inclusion.

METHODS

For the validation exercise, in a simulated postpartum haemorrhage scenario using known volumes of artificial blood, the accuracy of gravimetric measurement was compared with visual estimation made by delivery suite staff. In the clinical observation study, the blood volume lost during postpartum haemorrhage was measured gravimetrically according to our routine institutional protocol and was correlated with fall in haemoglobin. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of gravimetric measurement of blood loss.

RESULTS

Validation exercise: the mean percentage error of gravimetrically measured blood volume was 4.0±2.7% compared to visually estimated blood volume with a mean percentage error of 34.7±32.1%. Clinical observation study: 356 out of 6187 deliveries were identified as having major postpartum haemorrhage. The correlation coefficient between measured blood loss and corrected fall in haemoglobin for all patients was 0.77; correlation was stronger (0.80) for postpartum haemorrhage >1500mL, and similar during routine and out-of-hours working.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of the gravimetric method was confirmed in simulated postpartum haemorrhage. The clinical study shows that gravimetric measurement of blood loss is correlated with the fall in haemoglobin in postpartum haemorrhage where blood loss exceeds 1500mL. The method is simple to perform, requires only basic equipment, and can be taught and used by all maternity services during major postpartum haemorrhage.

摘要

背景

我们旨在验证模拟严重产后出血期间失血量重量法量化的准确性,并在一组连续的严重产后出血女性中评估该技术。该研究在英国一个大型分娩室进行,为期一年。所有经历严重产后出血的女性均符合纳入标准。

方法

在验证实验中,在使用已知体积的人造血模拟产后出血的场景下,将重量法测量的准确性与分娩室工作人员的目测估计进行比较。在临床观察研究中,根据我们机构的常规方案,通过重量法测量产后出血期间的失血量,并将其与血红蛋白下降情况相关联。主要结局指标是失血量重量法测量的准确性。

结果

验证实验:重量法测量的血容量平均百分比误差为4.0±2.7%,而目测估计的血容量平均百分比误差为34.7±32.1%。临床观察研究:在6187例分娩中,有356例被确定为发生严重产后出血。所有患者测量的失血量与校正后的血红蛋白下降之间的相关系数为0.77;产后出血>1500mL时相关性更强(0.80),在常规工作时间和非工作时间相似。

结论

重量法在模拟产后出血中的准确性得到了证实。临床研究表明,在产后出血失血量超过1500mL时,失血量的重量法测量与血红蛋白下降相关。该方法操作简单,仅需基本设备,所有产科服务人员在严重产后出血期间均可学习并使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验