Peklar Jure, O'Halloran Aisling M, Maidment Ian D, Henman Martin C, Kenny Rose Anne, Kos Mitja
Faculty for Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Apr;16(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
To explore the association between use of sedative drugs and frailty.
Cross-sectional study.
First wave of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), a nationally representative cohort of the community-dwelling population aged 50 years or older in Ireland.
Participants were 1642 men and 1804 women aged 65 years or older.
Regular use of sedative drugs determined according to the sedative load (SL) model, frailty phenotype status, and frailty deficit index (FI) score assessed using validated, established protocols.
Overall, 19% of the participants took sedative drugs, most frequently hypnotics and antidepressants. Sedative drug use was at 46% for frail, 23% for prefrail, and 9% for nonfrail participants. After adjustment for covariates, SL was positively associated with being prefrail (odds ratio [OR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.46) and frail (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.02-1.64). Advancing age but not sex remained significant (P < .001). After adjustment for covariates, the association between SL and the FI was also significant at P ≤ .001 (β = 1.77; 95% CI 1.13-2.42).
Higher SL was positively associated with phenotype frailty and the FI. This suggests that careful consideration must be given when prescribing sedatives to frail older adults, who are most vulnerable to adverse drug reactions and adverse health outcomes.
探讨镇静药物使用与衰弱之间的关联。
横断面研究。
爱尔兰纵向老龄化研究(TILDA)的第一波调查,这是一个具有全国代表性的队列,涵盖爱尔兰50岁及以上的社区居住人口。
1642名65岁及以上男性和1804名65岁及以上女性。
根据镇静负荷(SL)模型确定镇静药物的常规使用情况,使用经过验证的既定方案评估衰弱表型状态和衰弱缺陷指数(FI)得分。
总体而言,19%的参与者使用镇静药物,最常用的是催眠药和抗抑郁药。衰弱参与者中镇静药物使用率为46%,衰弱前期参与者为23%,非衰弱参与者为9%。在对协变量进行调整后,SL与衰弱前期(比值比[OR] 1.27;95%置信区间[CI] 1.11 - 1.46)和衰弱(OR 1.30;95% CI 1.02 - 1.64)呈正相关。年龄增长而非性别仍然具有显著意义(P < .001)。在对协变量进行调整后,SL与FI之间的关联在P ≤ .001时也具有显著意义(β = 1.77;95% CI 1.13 - 2.42)。
较高的SL与表型衰弱和FI呈正相关。这表明在为最易发生药物不良反应和不良健康结局的衰弱老年人开镇静药时必须谨慎考虑。