Stukan Maciej, Leśniewski-Kmak Krzysztof, Wróblewska Magdalena, Dudziak Mirosław
Gdynia Oncology Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Poland.
Gdynia Oncology Center, Department of Clinical Oncology, Poland.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Mar;136(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.073. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
Malignant ascites (MA) can be managed with paracentesis, diuretics, shunt-systems, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies. Some treatments are ineffective; others are associated with complications, involve inpatient procedures, or are not cost-effective. Postoperative lymphocysts (LCs) are managed with inpatient drainage and sclerotherapy or surgery. We tested the use of a vascular catheter in the management of symptomatic MA and LC.
Fifty-five patients with primary or recurrent cancers with ascites or LCs were managed for symptom relief. A central venous 14-Ga 16-cm catheter (Arrow) was inserted into the abdominal cavity or LC, followed by drainage.
The catheter was safely inserted with ultrasound guidance in 43 patients with MA (39 with ovarian cancer: 9 before primary cytoreduction, 30 with recurrence; 4 non-gynecological cancers), and 12 patients with LCs (10 retroperitoneal, 2 bilateral inguinal). All procedures were performed in the outpatient department under local anesthesia, without insertion-related complications. Within a mean of 30 days after catheter placement (range: 7-90 days), no grade 3 infection, peri-drain leakage, or self-removal was noted. In three patients with recurrent ovarian mucinous ascites and one patient with an inguinal LC, some drain obstruction was noted. In cases before primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer, drainage enabled better nutritional and anesthiological outcomes. Patients with chronic ascites were able to self-monitor the amount of evacuated fluid. Twelve patients whose ascites were drained had chemotherapy at the time, and they reported better well-being, and we estimated better performance status. LC drainage followed by sclerotherapy enabled symptom control and LC radical treatment.
The use of the vascular catheter is safe, easy, and cost-effective in the management of symptomatic MA and LC.
恶性腹水(MA)的治疗方法包括腹腔穿刺放液、利尿剂、分流系统、化疗和靶向治疗。有些治疗方法无效;其他方法则伴有并发症,需要住院治疗,或者不具有成本效益。术后淋巴囊肿(LCs)的治疗方法是住院引流、硬化治疗或手术。我们测试了使用血管导管治疗有症状的MA和LCs。
55例原发性或复发性癌症伴腹水或LCs的患者接受了症状缓解治疗。将一根14-Ga 16-cm的中心静脉导管(Arrow)插入腹腔或LCs,随后进行引流。
在超声引导下,43例MA患者(39例卵巢癌:9例在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术前,30例复发;4例非妇科癌症)和12例LCs患者(10例腹膜后,2例双侧腹股沟)的导管安全插入。所有操作均在门诊局部麻醉下进行,无插入相关并发症。在导管置入后的平均30天内(范围:7 - 90天),未发现3级感染、引流周围渗漏或自行拔除导管的情况。在3例复发性卵巢黏液性腹水患者和1例腹股沟LCs患者中,发现了一些引流管堵塞情况。在卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术前的病例中,引流使营养和麻醉效果更好。慢性腹水患者能够自行监测排出的液体量。12例腹水被引流的患者当时正在接受化疗,他们报告感觉更好,我们估计其体能状态更佳。LCs引流后进行硬化治疗可控制症状并实现LCs的根治性治疗。
在治疗有症状的MA和LCs时,使用血管导管安全、简便且具有成本效益。