Ivanek Renata, Lahodny Glenn
Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Feb 1;118(2-3):196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
For environmentally transmitted infectious diseases (ETIDs), which spread through the contaminated environment (such as foods, surfaces and fomites), there is a lack of consensus about the mathematical approach to derive R0, leading to inconsistent predictions about the spread and control of these infections in their host populations. The objective of this study was to explain three current, though conflicting, approaches to derive a theoretical expression for R0 for ETIDs and assess their validity through comparison with available empirical data. Salmonella Typhimurium in laboratory mice was used as a theoretical and empirical model system. The three conflicting theoretical expressions for R0 were derived using the next generation matrix approach according to three unverified hypotheses about the role of the environmental phase in the transmission of ETIDs. The hypotheses assume that the environment contaminated with a pathogen is: (H1) an extension of the host's infectious period, (H2) a reservoir for the infectious agent, or (H3) has both of these characteristics. For the parameter values describing the empirical model system, the theoretical values of R0 corresponding to the hypotheses H2 and H3 were very similar (1.38 and 1.62, respectively) and their values were approximately half of the value of R0 for hypothesis H1 (2.94). The theoretical R0 values were compared with an empirical R0 (1.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 2.02) estimated using a Martingale method from published experimental data on Salmonella Typhimurium transmission in mice. The results of the comparison suggested that hypothesis H1 is unlikely to hold true but it could not be rejected with confidence because of uncertainty in the value of the pathogen growth rate in the environment. The hypotheses H2 and H3 were both equally strongly supported with the empirical data suggesting that either of them could be valid. A sensitivity analysis identified critical information gaps about the indirect transmission rate of infection and the pathogen growth rate in the environment. Moreover, we identified experimental conditions for which the theoretical R0 predictions based on the hypotheses H2 and H3 differ greatly, which would assist their discrimination and conclusive validation against future empirical studies. Once a valid theoretical R0 is identified for Salmonella Typhimurium in mice, its generalizability to other host-pathogen-environment systems should be tested. The present study may serve as a template for integrated empirical and theoretical research of R0 in the epidemiology of ETIDs.
对于通过受污染环境(如食物、表面和污染物)传播的环境传播性传染病(ETIDs),在推导基本再生数(R0)的数学方法上缺乏共识,导致对这些感染在宿主群体中的传播和控制的预测不一致。本研究的目的是解释当前三种推导ETIDs的R0理论表达式的方法,尽管它们相互冲突,并通过与现有经验数据比较来评估其有效性。实验室小鼠中的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌被用作理论和经验模型系统。根据关于环境阶段在ETIDs传播中的作用的三个未经证实的假设,使用下一代矩阵方法推导了三个相互冲突的R0理论表达式。这些假设假定被病原体污染的环境是:(H1)宿主感染期的延长,(H2)传染源的储存库,或(H3)具有这两种特征。对于描述经验模型系统的参数值,与假设H2和H3对应的R0理论值非常相似(分别为1.38和1.62),其值约为假设H1的R0值(2.94)的一半。将理论R0值与使用鞅方法从已发表的关于鼠伤寒沙门氏菌在小鼠中传播的实验数据估计的经验R0(1.58,95%置信区间:1.14,2.02)进行比较。比较结果表明假设H1不太可能成立,但由于环境中病原体生长速率值的不确定性,不能自信地拒绝它。假设H2和H3都同样得到了经验数据的有力支持,表明它们中的任何一个都可能是有效的。敏感性分析确定了关于感染间接传播率和环境中病原体生长速率的关键信息差距。此外,我们确定了基于假设H2和H3的理论R0预测差异很大的实验条件,这将有助于它们的区分以及与未来经验研究的最终验证。一旦确定了小鼠中鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的有效理论R0,就应该测试其对其他宿主 - 病原体 - 环境系统的可推广性。本研究可作为ETIDs流行病学中R0综合经验和理论研究的模板。