Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后切口疝修补术:一项基于人群的研究。

Incisional hernia repair after caesarean section: a population-based study.

作者信息

Shand Antonia W, Chen Jian Sheng, Schnitzler Margaret, Roberts Christine L

机构信息

Clinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia; Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Apr;55(2):170-5. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12270. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernias occur at surgical abdominal incision sites, but the association with caesarean section (CS) has not been examined.

AIM

To determine whether CS is a risk factor for incisional hernia repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Population-based cohort study in Australia using linked birth and hospital data for women who gave birth from 2000 to 2011. Survival analysis was used to explore the association between CS and subsequent incisional hernia repair. Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors, including other abdominal surgery. The main outcome measure was surgical repair of an incisional hernia.

RESULTS

Of 642,578 women, 217,555 (33.9%) had at least one CS and 1,554 (0.2%) women had a subsequent incisional hernia repair. The rate of incisional hernia repair in women who had ever had a caesarean section was 0.47%, compared to 0.12% in women who never had a caesarean section. After controlling for the duration of follow-up and known explanatory variables (eg other abdominal surgery, parity and multiple pregnancy), the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 2.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.45-3.06, P < 0.001). Incisional hernia repair risk increased with number of caesarean sections: women with two CS had a threefold increased risk of incisional hernia repair, which increased to sixfold after five CS (aHR = 6.29, 95% CI 3.99-9.93, P < 0.001) compared to women with no CS.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong association between maternal CS and subsequent incisional hernia repair, which increased as the number of CSs increased, but the absolute risk of incisional hernia repair was low.

摘要

背景

切口疝发生于腹部手术切口部位,但剖宫产与切口疝的关联尚未得到研究。

目的

确定剖宫产是否为切口疝修补术的危险因素。

材料与方法

在澳大利亚开展基于人群的队列研究,使用2000年至2011年分娩女性的出生与医院数据链接。采用生存分析探讨剖宫产与后续切口疝修补术之间的关联。分析对包括其他腹部手术在内的混杂因素进行了校正。主要结局指标为切口疝的手术修补。

结果

在642,578名女性中,217,555名(33.9%)至少进行过一次剖宫产,1,554名(0.2%)女性随后接受了切口疝修补术。曾行剖宫产的女性切口疝修补率为0.47%,而从未行剖宫产的女性为0.12%。在控制随访时间和已知解释变量(如其他腹部手术、产次和多胎妊娠)后,校正风险比(aHR)为2.73(95%置信区间(CI)2.45 - 3.06,P < 0.001)。切口疝修补风险随剖宫产次数增加而升高:与未行剖宫产的女性相比,行两次剖宫产的女性切口疝修补风险增加两倍,行五次剖宫产的女性风险增至六倍(aHR = 6.29,95% CI 3.99 - 9.93,P < 0.001)。

结论

母亲剖宫产与后续切口疝修补术之间存在密切关联,且随着剖宫产次数增加而增强,但切口疝修补的绝对风险较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验