Murphy Catriona M, Whelan Brendan J, Normand Charles
Department of Medical Gerontology, The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Medicine, Centre of Health Policy and Management, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jul;23(4):408-18. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12157. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
The aim of this study was to provide a population-based estimate of the utilisation of publicly financed formal home care by older adults in Ireland and to identify the principal characteristics of those utilising formal home care. Data were collected through computer-aided personal interviews from a representative sample of community living older adults in Ireland. The interviews were conducted between 2009 and 2011 as part of the first wave of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). The study is cross-sectional in design and limited to participants aged 65 years and older (n = 3507). Results reveal that 8.2% (95% CI 7.1%-9.3%) of participants utilised publicly financed formal home care in the form of home help and/or personal care. Key determinants of formal home-care utilisation were Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) difficulty (Adj OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.7-5.3), older age (Adj OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.4-4.8) and living alone (Adj OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.8). Almost half of those utilising formal care did not self-report an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) difficulty or an IADL difficulty. Government policy aims to reduce the need for long-term residential care by providing formal home care for older adults with low to moderate levels of dependency. This requires an increasing emphasis on personal care provision in the home. No evidence was found in this study to suggest that a shift in emphasis from formal domestic to personal care is taking place in Ireland. The absence of standardised assessment and eligibility criteria are deemed to be barriers to reorientation of the system. From a health services perspective, the current situation is not sustainable into the future and requires a focused policy response.
本研究的目的是对爱尔兰老年人使用公共资金资助的正规居家护理情况进行基于人群的估计,并确定使用正规居家护理者的主要特征。数据通过计算机辅助个人访谈从爱尔兰社区居住老年人的代表性样本中收集。这些访谈于2009年至2011年进行,是爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)第一波的一部分。该研究为横断面设计,仅限于65岁及以上的参与者(n = 3507)。结果显示,8.2%(95%置信区间7.1%-9.3%)的参与者使用了以居家帮助和/或个人护理形式提供的公共资金资助的正规居家护理。正规居家护理使用的关键决定因素是日常生活工具性活动(IADL)困难(调整优势比3.8,95%置信区间2.7-5.3)、年龄较大(调整优势比3.4,95%置信区间2.4-4.8)和独居(调整优势比2.6,95%置信区间1.9-3.8)。几乎一半使用正规护理的人并未自我报告日常生活活动(ADL)困难或IADL困难。政府政策旨在通过为低至中度依赖水平的老年人提供正规居家护理来减少长期住院护理的需求。这需要越来越重视在家中提供个人护理。本研究未发现证据表明爱尔兰正在发生从正规家务护理向个人护理的重点转移。缺乏标准化评估和资格标准被认为是该系统重新定位的障碍。从卫生服务的角度来看,目前的情况在未来是不可持续的,需要有针对性的政策回应。