Belmonti Vittorio, Cioni Giovanni, Berthoz Alain
Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa (Calambrone), Italy.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Dev Sci. 2015 Jul;18(4):569-86. doi: 10.1111/desc.12240. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
Navigational and reaching spaces are known to involve different cognitive strategies and brain networks, whose development in humans is still debated. In fact, high-level spatial processing, including allocentric location encoding, is already available to very young children, but navigational strategies are not mature until late childhood. The Magic Carpet (MC) is a new electronic device translating the traditional Corsi Block-tapping Test (CBT) to navigational space. In this study, the MC and the CBT were used to assess spatial memory for navigation and for reaching, respectively. Our hypothesis was that school-age children would not treat MC stimuli as navigational paths, assimilating them to reaching sequences. Ninety-one healthy children aged 6 to 11 years and 18 adults were enrolled. Overall short-term memory performance (span) on both tests, effects of sequence geometry, and error patterns according to a new classification were studied. Span increased with age on both tests, but relatively more in navigational than in reaching space, particularly in males. Sequence geometry specifically influenced navigation, not reaching. The number of body rotations along the path affected MC performance in children more than in adults, and in women more than in men. Error patterns indicated that navigational sequences were increasingly retained as global paths across development, in contrast to separately stored reaching locations. A sequence of spatial locations can be coded as a navigational path only if a cognitive switch from a reaching mode to a navigation mode occurs. This implies the integration of egocentric and allocentric reference frames, of visual and idiothetic cues, and access to long-term memory. This switch is not yet fulfilled at school age due to immature executive functions.
已知导航空间和伸手可及空间涉及不同的认知策略和脑网络,其在人类中的发展仍存在争议。事实上,包括以体为中心的位置编码在内的高级空间处理能力在幼儿时期就已具备,但导航策略直到童年后期才成熟。“魔毯”(MC)是一种新型电子设备,它将传统的科西方块敲击测试(CBT)转换到导航空间。在本研究中,MC和CBT分别用于评估导航和伸手可及的空间记忆。我们的假设是学龄儿童不会将MC刺激视为导航路径,而是将它们同化为伸手可及的序列。研究招募了91名6至11岁的健康儿童和18名成年人。研究了两项测试的总体短期记忆表现(广度)、序列几何形状的影响以及根据新分类的错误模式。两项测试的广度均随年龄增长而增加,但在导航空间中的增加幅度相对大于伸手可及空间,尤其是在男性中。序列几何形状对导航有特定影响,对伸手可及空间则无影响。沿着路径的身体旋转次数对儿童MC表现的影响大于成年人,对女性的影响大于男性。错误模式表明,与单独存储的伸手可及位置相比,导航序列在整个发育过程中越来越多地作为全局路径被保留。只有当发生从伸手可及模式到导航模式的认知转换时,一系列空间位置才能被编码为导航路径。这意味着自我中心和以体为中心参考框架的整合、视觉和本体感觉线索的整合以及对长期记忆的访问。由于执行功能不成熟,这种转换在学龄期尚未实现。