Zhou Huixia, Ming Shaoxiong, Ma Lifei, Wang Chao, Liu Xin, Zhou Xiaoguang, Xie Huawei, Tao Tian, Ma Sichao, Cheng Wei
Department of Urology, Bayi Children's Hospital Affiliated to Beijing Military Region General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Urology. 2014 Nov;84(5):1199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.040. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
To present our experience regarding transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy (SILH) in children with duplex kidney anomalies, and to investigate its feasibility and safety compared with those of conventional laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy (CLH).
A matched-pair study comparing 34 SILHs and 34 CLHs performed by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2013 was presented. All SILHs were performed through a 2-cm periumbilical incision by using the port-access system, whereas CLH cases were performed via a transperitoneal 3-port approach. The groups were matched for age, gender, weight, laterality, and surgical indication of the patients. Data including demographics and perioperative and short-term outcomes of the patients were retrospectively compared.
The 2 groups were comparable in demographics, and surgical indications of the patients (P >.05). No significant difference was observed between SILH and CLH cases in terms of median operative time (105 vs 97 minutes; P = .06), estimated blood loss (22 vs 25 mL; P = .91), interval for oral intake (12 vs 12 hours; P = .69), analgesic requirement (9 vs 6 cases; P = .38), transfusion rate (0% for both; P = 1.00), complication rate (2.9% vs 0%; P = 1.00), postoperative hospital stay (5.0 vs 4.5 days; P = .59), and renal functional loss of the operated side at 3 months after surgery (5.4% vs 5.2%; P = .60).
SILH is feasible and safe in the hands of an experienced pediatric laparoscopic surgeon. Although the outcomes were comparable, better subjective cosmetic results of SILH were achieved.
介绍我们在双肾畸形患儿中进行经脐单孔腹腔镜半肾输尿管切除术(SILH)的经验,并与传统腹腔镜半肾输尿管切除术(CLH)相比,探讨其可行性和安全性。
呈现一项配对研究,比较2007年至2013年由同一位外科医生实施的34例SILH和34例CLH。所有SILH均通过脐周2cm切口使用端口接入系统进行,而CLH病例则通过经腹三孔法进行。两组在患者的年龄、性别、体重、侧别和手术指征方面进行匹配。对患者的人口统计学数据以及围手术期和短期结局等数据进行回顾性比较。
两组在人口统计学和患者手术指征方面具有可比性(P>.05)。SILH组和CLH组在中位手术时间(105对97分钟;P=.06)、估计失血量(22对25mL;P=.91)、口服摄入间隔时间(12对12小时;P=.69)、镇痛需求(9对6例;P=.38)、输血率(两组均为0%;P=1.00)、并发症发生率(2.9%对0%;P=1.00)、术后住院时间(5.0对4.5天;P=.59)以及术后3个月患侧肾功能丧失情况(5.4%对5.2%;P=.60)方面均未观察到显著差异。
在经验丰富的小儿腹腔镜外科医生手中,SILH是可行且安全的。尽管结果相当,但SILH在主观美容效果方面更佳。