Valent Amy M, DeFranco Emily A, Allison Allessa, Salem Ahmed, Klarquist Lori, Gonzales Kyle, Habli Mounira, Adair C David, Armistead Casey, Wang Yuping, Lewis David, Sibai Baha
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; Center for Prevention of Preterm Birth, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):515.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.1090. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of expectantly managed pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia vs mild preeclampsia up to 37 weeks of gestation.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of all pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia or mild preeclampsia expectantly managed in the hospital from January 2008 through December 2011. The primary outcomes, adverse maternal and neonatal composite morbidities, were compared between these 2 groups. Frequency differences of maternal adverse outcomes were stratified by gestational age at delivery of <34 and 34-36(6/7) weeks of gestation.
We found no significant differences in rates of neonatal composite morbidity or latency periods between women with superimposed preeclampsia and mild preeclampsia. Adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly higher at <34 compared to 34-36(6/7) weeks of gestation (97-98% vs 48-50%) in both cohorts. Maternal adverse composite outcome occurred more frequently in women with superimposed preeclampsia compared to mild preeclampsia (15% vs 5%; P = .003; relative risk, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-6.29).
Women with superimposed preeclampsia have similar neonatal outcomes but more maternal complications than women with preeclampsia without severe features who are expectantly managed <37 weeks.
我们试图比较妊娠合并慢性高血压并叠加先兆子痫与轻度先兆子痫至妊娠37周时经期待治疗的孕产妇和新生儿结局。
这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2008年1月至2011年12月期间在医院接受期待治疗的所有妊娠合并慢性高血压并叠加先兆子痫或轻度先兆子痫的病例。比较这两组的主要结局,即孕产妇和新生儿不良复合发病率。孕产妇不良结局的频率差异按分娩孕周<34周和34 - 36(6/7)周进行分层。
我们发现叠加先兆子痫组和轻度先兆子痫组之间的新生儿复合发病率或潜伏期无显著差异。在两个队列中,与34 - 36(6/7)周相比,<34周时不良新生儿结局显著更高(97 - 98%对48 - 50%)。与轻度先兆子痫相比,叠加先兆子痫的妇女发生孕产妇不良复合结局更为频繁(15%对5%;P = .003;相对风险,3.0;95%置信区间,1.45 - 6.29)。
妊娠合并慢性高血压并叠加先兆子痫的妇女与妊娠合并轻度先兆子痫且在<37周时接受期待治疗的妇女相比,有相似的新生儿结局,但孕产妇并发症更多。