Long Kira N, Houston Robert, Watson J Devin B, Morrison Jonathan J, Rasmussen Todd E, Propper Brandon W, Arthurs Zachary M
59th Medical Wing, San Antonio, TX; Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, WA; Department of Surgery, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
Division of Vascular Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;29(1):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Noncompressible torso hemorrhage remains an ongoing problem for both military and civilian trauma. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been characterized as a potentially life-saving maneuver. The objective of this study was to determine the functional outcomes, paraplegia rates, and survival of 60-min balloon occlusion in the proximal and distal thoracic aorta in a porcine model of controlled hemorrhage.
Swine (Sus scrofa, 70-110 kg) were subjected to class IV hemorrhagic shock and underwent 60 min of REBOA. Devices were introduced from the left carotid artery and positioned in the thoracic aorta in either the proximal location (pREBOA [n = 8]; just past takeoff of left subclavian artery) or distal location (dREBOA [n = 8]; just above diaphragm). After REBOA, animals were resuscitated with whole blood, crystalloid, and vasopressors before a 4-day postoperative period. End points included evidence of spinal cord ischemia (clinical examination, Tarlov gait score, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and histopathology), gross ischemia-reperfusion injury (clinical examination and histopathology), and mortality.
The overall mortality was similar between pREBOA and dREBOA groups at 37.5% (n = 3). Spinal cord-related mortality was 12.5% for both pREBOA and dREBOA groups. Spinal cord symptoms without death were present in 12.5% of pREBOA and dREBOA groups. Average gait scores improved throughout the postoperative period.
REBOA placement in the proximal or distal thoracic aorta does not alter mortality or paraplegia rates as compared with controlled hemorrhage alone. Functional recovery improves in the presence or the absence of REBOA, although at a slower rate after REBOA as compared with negative controls. Additional research is required to determine the ideal placement of REBOA in an uncontrolled hemorrhage model to achieve use compatible with survival outcomes and quality of life.
不可压缩性躯干出血对于军事和民用创伤而言仍是一个持续存在的问题。复苏性血管内主动脉球囊阻断术(REBOA)已被视为一种可能挽救生命的操作。本研究的目的是在可控出血的猪模型中,确定在胸主动脉近端和远端进行60分钟球囊阻断后的功能结局、截瘫发生率和生存率。
猪(体重70 - 110千克)遭受IV级失血性休克并接受60分钟的REBOA。装置从左颈动脉插入并置于胸主动脉的近端位置(近端REBOA [n = 8];刚好在左锁骨下动脉起始处之后)或远端位置(远端REBOA [n = 8];刚好在膈肌上方)。REBOA后,动物在术后4天内用全血、晶体液和血管升压药进行复苏。终点指标包括脊髓缺血的证据(临床检查、塔尔洛夫步态评分、肠道和膀胱功能障碍以及组织病理学)、严重缺血再灌注损伤(临床检查和组织病理学)以及死亡率。
近端REBOA组和远端REBOA组的总体死亡率相似,均为37.5%(n = 3)。近端REBOA组和远端REBOA组与脊髓相关的死亡率均为12.5%。近端REBOA组和远端REBOA组中无死亡的脊髓症状发生率为12.5%。术后期间平均步态评分有所改善。
与单纯可控出血相比,在胸主动脉近端或远端放置REBOA不会改变死亡率或截瘫发生率。无论是否存在REBOA,功能恢复均有所改善,尽管与阴性对照组相比,REBOA后的恢复速度较慢。需要进一步研究以确定REBOA在不可控出血模型中的理想放置位置,以实现与生存结局和生活质量相匹配的应用。