• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下黏膜切除术治疗大型直肠腺瘤:一项多中心合作的研究结果。

Endoscopic mucosal resection of large rectal adenomas in the era of centralization: Results of a multicenter collaboration.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Dec;2(6):497-504. doi: 10.1177/2050640614554218.

DOI:10.1177/2050640614554218
PMID:25452845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4245307/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large rectal adenomas is largely being centralized. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of EMR in the rectum in a collaboration of 15 Dutch hospitals.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study of patients with rectal adenomas >3 cm, resected by piecemeal EMR. Endoscopic treatment of adenoma remnants at 3 months was considered part of the intervention strategy. Outcomes included recurrence after 6, 12 and 24 months and morbidity.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (50% male, age 69 ± 11, 96% ASA 1/2) presented with 65 adenomas (diameter 46 ± 17 mm, distance ab ano 4.5 cm (IQR 1-8), 6% recurrent lesion). Sixty-two procedures (97%) were technically successful. Histopathology revealed invasive carcinoma in three patients (5%), who were excluded from effectiveness analyses. At 3 months' follow-up, 10 patients showed adenoma remnants. Recurrence was diagnosed in 16 patients during follow-up (recurrence rate 25%). Fifteen of 64 patients (23%) experienced 17 postprocedural complications.

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter collaboration, EMR was feasible in 97% of patients. Recurrence and postprocedural morbidity rates were 25% and 23%. Our results demonstrate the outcomes of EMR in the absence of tertiary referral centers.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)对大型直肠腺瘤的治疗正在集中进行。我们评估了 15 家荷兰医院合作中直肠 EMR 的安全性和有效性。

方法

对>3cm 的直肠腺瘤患者进行前瞻性、观察性研究,采用分片 EMR 切除。3 个月时内镜治疗腺瘤残余物被认为是干预策略的一部分。主要结局包括 6、12 和 24 个月后的复发率和发病率。

结果

64 例患者(50%为男性,年龄 69±11 岁,96%ASA 1/2 级)共存在 65 个腺瘤(直径 46±17mm,肛缘距离 4.5cm(IQR 1-8),6%为复发病灶)。62 例(97%)手术技术成功。3 例患者(5%)病理显示浸润性癌,被排除在有效性分析之外。在 3 个月的随访中,10 例患者存在腺瘤残余。在随访期间,16 例患者被诊断为复发(复发率 25%)。64 例患者中有 15 例(23%)发生了 17 例术后并发症。

结论

在多中心合作中,97%的患者可行 EMR。复发和术后发病率分别为 25%和 23%。我们的结果表明,在没有三级转诊中心的情况下,EMR 的治疗效果良好。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic mucosal resection of large rectal adenomas in the era of centralization: Results of a multicenter collaboration.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗大型直肠腺瘤:一项多中心合作的研究结果。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Dec;2(6):497-504. doi: 10.1177/2050640614554218.
2
Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas.内镜下黏膜切除术与经肛门内镜显微手术治疗大型直肠腺瘤的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02863.x.
3
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study).经肛门内镜显微手术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠直肠腺瘤的比较(TREND研究)
BMC Surg. 2009 Mar 13;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-4.
4
The effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function.内镜黏膜切除术和经肛门内镜显微手术对肛肠功能的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):e534-41. doi: 10.1111/codi.12311.
5
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
6
Advanced mucosal neoplasia of the anorectal junction: endoscopic resection technique and outcomes (with videos).肛门直肠连接部高级黏膜肿瘤:内镜切除术技术及结果(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan;79(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
7
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video).水下内镜黏膜切除术治疗既往大肠息肉分块切除术后复发(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1094-102. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.318. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
A prospective analysis of extended endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery.大型直肠绒毛状腺瘤扩大内镜黏膜切除术的前瞻性分析:经肛门内镜显微手术的替代技术
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jul;7(4):339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00813.x.
9
Endoscopic Suturing for the Prevention and Treatment of Complications Associated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Duodenal Adenomas.内镜缝合术用于预防和治疗与十二指肠大腺瘤内镜黏膜切除术相关的并发症。
Clin Endosc. 2022 Jan;55(1):95-100. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.281. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm.内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜切除术治疗直径大于 20mm 的侧向扩展肿瘤的临床疗效。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27(4):734-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06977.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial.经内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)热消融与无辅助治疗(RESPECT)后高级无蒂和侧向蔓延型结直肠腺瘤复发的国际随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Feb 17;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07915-2.
2
Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.结肠和直肠复杂息肉的管理
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;33(2):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2950-1. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps.内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)作为复杂结肠息肉患者手术替代方案的疗效
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84(2):315-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.067. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal adenomas: Only for expert centers?大肠大腺瘤的内镜黏膜切除术:仅适用于专家中心?
United European Gastroenterol J. 2015 Apr;3(2):171-3. doi: 10.1177/2050640615577535.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
2
Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon.预测结直肠平坦和凹陷型胃肠道肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术完全切除的因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 May;107(5):650-4. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.473.
3
Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.结肠镜息肉切除术与结直肠癌死亡的长期预防。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.
4
Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.内镜黏膜切除术与经肛门内镜显微手术治疗大型直肠腺瘤的系统评价。
Endoscopy. 2011 Nov;43(11):941-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256765. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
5
Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗进展期结直肠黏膜肿瘤的疗效及预测黏膜下癌的价值。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jun;140(7):1909-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.062. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
6
Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party.内镜操作复杂程度分级:美国胃肠内镜学会工作组的研究结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
7
A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.内镜不良事件词汇表:美国胃肠内镜学会研讨会报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027.
8
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study).经肛门内镜显微手术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠直肠腺瘤的比较(TREND研究)
BMC Surg. 2009 Mar 13;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-4.
9
A prospective analysis of extended endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery.大型直肠绒毛状腺瘤扩大内镜黏膜切除术的前瞻性分析:经肛门内镜显微手术的替代技术
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jul;7(4):339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00813.x.
10
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.手术并发症的分类:一项在6336例患者队列中进行评估的新提议及一项调查结果
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.