Suppr超能文献

CAD/CAM氧化锆基底冠内部及边缘适合性的体外评价

In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings.

作者信息

Lins Leonardo, Bemfica Vinícius, Queiroz Celso, Canabarro Antonio

机构信息

Graduate student, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Postdoctoral student, Department of Material Science, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Mar;113(3):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The constant updating of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) systems and the introduction of new systems confirm the need for scientific evidence on internal and marginal adaptation.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the degree of internal and marginal misfits of zirconia single-unit copings made by using 3 different CAD/CAM systems (Ceramill, Lava 3M, and Neoshape).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-four anatomic prefabricated abutments (Neodent) were used to fabricate zirconia copings in Ceramill (n=8), Lava (n=8), and Neoshape (n=8). All copings were cemented and cut with a precision cutting machine to obtain 5 surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, palatal, and incisal) and angle regions (internal axiogingival and axioincisal angles). Measurements were obtained from images at a magnification of ×100 and ×200 made with a digital camera attached to an optical microscope and adapted with a measuring device. The data were statistically analyzed with the 2-way ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference tests (α=.05).

RESULTS

In the internal misfit evaluation, the mean values observed for Ceramill, Lava, and Neoshape were palatal surface 76.5, 65.5, and 77.7 μm (P=.003); angle regions 69.4, 68.6, and 74.5 μm (P=.010); incisal surface 127.7, 97.2, and 182.2 μm (P<.001); and overall mean 72.1, 69.4, and 76.4 μm (P=.003). Significant differences were not found for mesial, distal, or buccal surfaces (P>.05). In the evaluation of marginal misfit (marginal discrepancy and absolute marginal discrepancy), the mean values found were 40.9 and 65.8 μm for Ceramill, 34.2 and 70.0 μm for Lava, and 39.3 and 74.5 μm for Neoshape. No significant differences were found among the 3 systems (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the Lava system showed a significantly lower value of internal misfit than the Neoshape system, all systems showed clinically acceptable marginal misfit values.

摘要

问题陈述

计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统的不断更新以及新系统的引入证实了对内部和边缘适应性科学证据的需求。

目的

本体外研究的目的是测量和比较使用3种不同CAD/CAM系统(Ceramill、Lava 3M和Neoshape)制作的氧化锆单单位全冠内冠的内部和边缘不匹配程度。

材料与方法

使用24个解剖预制基台(Neodent)在Ceramill(n = 8)、Lava(n = 8)和Neoshape(n = 8)中制作氧化锆全冠内冠。所有全冠内冠均进行粘固,并用精密切割机切割以获得5个表面(近中、远中、颊侧、腭侧和切端)以及角度区域(内部轴龈角和轴切角)。通过连接到光学显微镜并配备测量装置的数码相机在放大倍数为×100和×200下获取图像进行测量。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey真实显著性差异检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

在内部不匹配评估中,Ceramill、Lava和Neoshape观察到的平均值分别为:腭侧表面76.5、65.5和77.7μm(P = 0.003);角度区域69.4、68.6和74.5μm(P = 0.010);切端表面127.7、97.2和182.2μm(P < 0.001);总体平均值72.1、69.4和76.4μm(P = 0.003)。近中、远中或颊侧表面未发现显著差异(P > 0.05)。在边缘不匹配评估(边缘差异和绝对边缘差异)中,Ceramill的平均值分别为40.9和65.8μm,Lava为34.2和70.0μm,Neoshape为39.3和74.5μm。3个系统之间未发现显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

尽管Lava系统显示出比Neoshape系统显著更低的内部不匹配值,但所有系统均显示出临床上可接受的边缘不匹配值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验