Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物成瘾的丁丙诺啡注射者:格鲁吉亚共和国12周丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮或美沙酮治疗期间及之后的药物使用情况

Opioid addicted buprenorphine injectors: drug use during and after 12-weeks of buprenorphine-naloxone or methadone in the Republic of Georgia.

作者信息

Piralishvili Gvantsa, Otiashvili David, Sikharulidze Zura, Kamkamidze George, Poole Sabrina, Woody George E

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health and Prevention of Addiction, 21a Kavtaradze str., Tbilisi, GA 0186, USA.

Addiction Research Center, Alternative Georgia, 14a Nutsubidze Street, Office 2,Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Mar;50:32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of non-opioid drug use among opioid-addicted, buprenorphine injecting individuals in Georgia, during and after a 12-week course of buprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone®) or methadone.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial with daily observed Suboxone® or methadone and weekly counseling, urine tests and timeline followback (TLFB) in weeks 0-12 and 20, and the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 20.

RESULTS

Of the 80 patients (40/group, 4 women), 68 (85%) completed the 12-weeks of study treatment and 66 (82.5%) completed the 20-week follow-up. At baseline, injecting more than one drug in the last 30 days was reported by 68.4% of patients in the methadone and 72.5% in the Suboxone® groups. Drug use was markedly reduced in both treatment conditions but there were significant differences in the prevalence of specific drugs with more opioid (1.5 vs. 0.2%; p=0.03), less amphetamine (0.2 vs. 2.8%; p<0.001) and less marijuana (1.7 vs. 10.2%; p<0.001) positive urine tests in the methadone vs. Suboxone® groups. At the 20-week follow-up, TLFB results on the 34 that continued methadone or the 3 on Suboxone® showed less opioid (5.6 vs. 27.6%; p<0.001), illicit buprenorphine (2.7 vs. 13.8%; p=0.005), benzodiazepine (13.5 vs. 34.5%; p<0.001), and marijuana (2.8 vs. 20.7%; p<0.001) use than the 29 who did not continue opioid substitution therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite small but significant differences in opioid and other drug use, both treatments were highly effective in reducing opioid and non-opioid drug use.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在佐治亚州,接受为期12周的丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮(舒倍生®)或美沙酮治疗期间及之后,注射丁丙诺啡的阿片类药物成瘾者中非阿片类药物的使用情况。

方法

随机对照试验,每日观察舒倍生®或美沙酮治疗情况,并进行每周一次的咨询、尿液检测以及在第0 - 12周和第20周进行时间线追溯法(TLFB)评估,同时在第0、4、8、12、20周进行成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)评估。

结果

80名患者(每组40名,4名女性)中,68名(85%)完成了为期12周的研究治疗,66名(82.5%)完成了20周的随访。基线时,美沙酮组68.4%的患者和舒倍生®组72.5%的患者报告在过去30天内注射过不止一种药物。两种治疗情况下药物使用均显著减少,但在特定药物的使用流行率方面存在显著差异,美沙酮组与舒倍生®组相比,阿片类药物阳性尿液检测更多(1.5%对0.2%;p = 0.03),苯丙胺类药物更少(0.2%对2.8%;p < 0.001),大麻更少(1.7%对10.2%;p < 0.001)。在20周随访时,对继续接受美沙酮治疗的34名患者或接受舒倍生®治疗的3名患者进行的时间线追溯法结果显示,与未继续接受阿片类药物替代治疗的29名患者相比,阿片类药物使用更少(5.6%对27.6%;p < 0.001),非法丁丙诺啡使用更少(2.7%对13.8%;p = 0.005),苯二氮䓬类药物更少(13.5%对34.5%;p < 0.001),大麻使用更少(2.8%对20.7%;p < 0.001)。

结论

尽管在阿片类药物和其他药物使用方面存在微小但显著的差异,但两种治疗在减少阿片类药物和非阿片类药物使用方面均非常有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验