Martínez-González Javier, Téllez Villajos Luis, Aicart-Ramos Marta, Crespo Pérez Laura, Graus Morales Javier, Boixeda de Miguel Daniel, Albillos Martínez Agustín
Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, España.
Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, España.
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;38(2):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is defined as bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract with no obvious cause after assessment with upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. In these cases, the source is suspected to be in the small bowel. Obscure bleeding can be occult or overt. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and analytical characteristics and findings on capsule endoscopy in patients with OGIB and to determine the factors related to the detection of lesions in both forms of presentation.
We performed a retrospective study of capsule endoscopies carried out between November 2009 and November 2012 for OGIB.
We analyzed 284 capsule endoscopies in 272 patients. Initially, 12 procedures could not be evaluated and were repeated. A total of 272 procedures were finally included in the analysis. The results of 114 (41.9%) capsule endoscopies were normal. Compared with patients with occult OGIB, those with overt OGIB were significantly older (70.2 vs. 67.5 years; p = 0.04), consumed more NSAID (24.2% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.01), had higher hemoglobin levels (9.3 vs. 10.4; p < 0,001) and more frequently required transfusion (64.5% vs 32.2%; p < 0.001). No differences were found between the two forms of presentation in the detection of canker sores-ulcers and polyps-masses. Vascular lesions were more frequently detected in overt than in occult OGIB (40.3% vs. 25.7%, respectively), (p < 0.05). When the total number of diagnoses carried out by capsule endoscopy was analyzed, no differences were found in diagnostic yield between overt OGIB (57%) and occult OGIB (54%), (p = 0.6). In overt OGIB, multivariate analysis showed that the variables that significantly predicted the detection of lesions on capsule endoscopy were consumption of medication NSAID (OR 2.75; p = 0.01), antiplatelets and anticoagulants (OR 2.64; p = 0.03) and analytical data hemoglobin (OR 3.23; p < 0.001) and INR (OR 1.8; p = 0.02). In occult OGIB, multivariate analysis showed that the factors significantly related to the detection of lesions on endoscopy were age (OR 1.9; p = 0.04) and NSAID consumption (OR 2.1; p = 0.01).
Capsule endoscopy is essential in the assessment of OGIB. Although the diagnostic yield was similar in both forms of presentation, vascular lesions were more frequently detected in overt OGIB. The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy could be optimized by taking into account the form of presentation (overt vs. occult) and certain clinical and analytic data (age, drug consumption, hemoglobin).
不明原因胃肠道出血(OGIB)定义为经上、下消化道内镜检查评估后,胃肠道无明显病因的出血。在这些病例中,出血源怀疑位于小肠。不明原因出血可为隐匿性或显性。本研究的目的是分析OGIB患者的临床和分析特征以及胶囊内镜检查结果,并确定与两种表现形式中病变检测相关的因素。
我们对2009年11月至2012年11月期间因OGIB进行的胶囊内镜检查进行了回顾性研究。
我们分析了272例患者的284次胶囊内镜检查。最初,12例检查无法评估并进行了重复检查。最终共有272例检查纳入分析。114例(41.9%)胶囊内镜检查结果正常。与隐匿性OGIB患者相比,显性OGIB患者年龄显著更大(70.2岁对67.5岁;p = 0.04),服用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)更多(24.2%对11.9%;p = 0.01),血红蛋白水平更高(9.3对10.4;p < 0.001),输血频率更高(64.5%对32.2%;p < 0.001)。在溃疡和息肉 - 肿物的检测方面,两种表现形式之间未发现差异。血管病变在显性OGIB中比隐匿性OGIB更常被检测到(分别为40.3%对25.7%),(p < 0.05)。当分析胶囊内镜检查做出的诊断总数时,显性OGIB(57%)和隐匿性OGIB(54%)的诊断率没有差异,(p = 0.6)。在显性OGIB中,多变量分析显示,显著预测胶囊内镜检查病变检测的变量是服用NSAID药物(比值比[OR] 2.75;p = 0.01)、抗血小板药物和抗凝剂(OR 2.64;p = 0.03)以及分析数据血红蛋白(OR 3.23;p < 0.001)和国际标准化比值(INR)(OR 1.8;p = 0.02)。在隐匿性OGIB中,多变量分析显示,与内镜检查病变检测显著相关的因素是年龄(OR 1.9;p = 0.04)和NSAID服用情况(OR 2.1;p = 0.01)。
胶囊内镜检查在OGIB评估中至关重要。尽管两种表现形式的诊断率相似,但血管病变在显性OGIB中更常被检测到。考虑表现形式(显性与隐匿性)以及某些临床和分析数据(年龄、药物服用情况、血红蛋白)可优化胶囊内镜检查的诊断率。