Suppr超能文献

采用改进的三通道因子分析模型对同步粒径分级的细颗粒物和粗颗粒物进行源解析。

Source apportionment of synchronously size segregated fine and coarse particulate matter, using an improved three-way factor analysis model.

机构信息

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

College of Software, Nankai University, No. 94 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300071, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:1182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.106. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

Abstract

Samples of PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅ were synchronously collected from a megacity in China (Chengdu) during the 2011 sampling campaign and then analyzed by an improved three-way factor analysis method based on ME2 (multilinear engine 2), to investigate the contributions and size distributions of the source categories for size segregated particulate matter (PM). Firstly, the synthetic test was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the improved three-way model. The same five source categories with slightly different source profiles were caught. The low AAE (average absolute error) values between the estimated and the synthetic source contributions (<15%) and the approachable estimated PM₂.₅/PM₁₀ ratios with the simulated ratios might indicate that the results of the improved three-way factor analysis might be satisfactory. Then, for the ambient PM samples, the mean levels were 206.65 ± 69.90 μg/m(3) (PM₁₀) and 130.47 ± 43.67 μg/m(3) (PM₂.₅). The average ratio of PM₂.₅/PM₁₀ was 0.63. PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅ in Chengdu were influenced by the same source categories and their percentage contributions were in the same order: crustal dust & coal combustion presented the highest percentage contributions, accounting for 58.20% (PM₁₀) and 53.73% (PM2.5); followed by vehicle exhaust & secondary organic carbon (18.45% for PM₁₀ and 21.63% for PM₂.₅), secondary sulfate and nitrate (17.06% for PM₁₀ and 20.91% for PM₂.₅) and cement dust (6.30% for PM₁₀ and 3.73% for PM₂.₅). The source profiles and contributions presented slightly different distributions for PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅, which could better reflect the actual situation. The findings based on the improved three-way factor analysis method may provide clear and deep insights into the sources of synchronously size-resolved PM.

摘要

采用基于 ME2(多线性引擎 2)的改进三通道因子分析方法,同步采集了中国一个特大城市(成都)2011 年采样期间的 PM₁₀ 和 PM₂.₅ 样本,以研究不同粒径颗粒物(PM)来源类别的贡献和粒径分布。首先,进行综合测试以评估改进的三通道模型的准确性。捕捉到相同的五个来源类别,但略有不同的来源分布。估计和综合来源贡献之间的低 AAE(平均绝对误差)值(<15%)和接近的估计 PM₂.₅/PM₁₀ 比与模拟比可能表明改进的三通道因子分析的结果可能令人满意。然后,对于环境 PM 样本,平均值分别为 206.65 ± 69.90 μg/m³(PM₁₀)和 130.47 ± 43.67 μg/m³(PM₂.₅)。PM₂.₅/PM₁₀ 的平均比值为 0.63。成都的 PM₁₀ 和 PM₂.₅受到相同来源类别的影响,其贡献百分比按相同顺序排列:地壳尘和煤燃烧的贡献最高,分别占 58.20%(PM₁₀)和 53.73%(PM₂.₅);其次是车辆尾气和二次有机碳(PM₁₀ 为 18.45%,PM₂.₅ 为 21.63%)、二次硫酸盐和硝酸盐(PM₁₀ 为 17.06%,PM₂.₅ 为 20.91%)和水泥尘(PM₁₀ 为 6.30%,PM₂.₅ 为 3.73%)。PM₁₀ 和 PM₂.₅ 的源分布和贡献略有不同,这可以更好地反映实际情况。基于改进的三通道因子分析方法的研究结果可能为同步粒径分辨 PM 的来源提供清晰和深入的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验