Suppr超能文献

颈内动脉和颈总动脉支架置入术后的颈外动脉狭窄

External carotid artery stenosis after internal and common carotid stenting.

作者信息

Siracuse Jeffrey J, Epelboym Irene, Li Boyangzi, Hoque Rahima, Catz Diana, Morrissey Nicholas J

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

Section of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;29(3):443-6. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The external carotid artery (ECA) can be an important collateral for cerebral perfusion in the presence of severe internal carotid artery (ICA) disease. ICA stenting that covers the ECA origin may put the ECA at increased risk of stenosis. Our objective was to determine the rate of ECA stenosis secondary to ICA stenting, determine predictive factors, and describe any subsequent associated symptoms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data on all ICA stents crossing the origin of the ECA placed by vascular surgeons at our institution. We analyzed patient demographics, comorbidities, stent type and sizes, as well as medication profile to determine predictors of ECA stenosis.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2013, there were 72 (out of 119 total ICA stenting) patients (mean age 71, 68% male) who underwent placement of ICA stents that also crossed the origin of the ECA. Six patients (8.3%) had a significantly increased ECA stenosis postprocedure. There were no occlusions. All patients with ECA stenosis maintained patency of their ICA stent and were asymptomatic. Age, gender, comorbidities, stent type and size, and medication profile were not associated with ECA stenosis after stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

ECA stenosis after ICA stenting covering the ECA origin is uncommon and not clinically significant in patients with patent ICA stents. The clinical significance of concurrent ECA and ICA stenosis after stenting is unclear as it is not captured here. The potential for ECA stenosis should not deter stenting across the ECA origin if necessary. Patient and stent factors are not predictive of ECA stenosis.

摘要

背景

在严重颈内动脉(ICA)疾病的情况下,颈外动脉(ECA)可能是脑灌注的重要侧支血管。覆盖ECA起始部的ICA支架置入术可能会增加ECA发生狭窄的风险。我们的目的是确定ICA支架置入术后ECA狭窄的发生率,确定预测因素,并描述随后出现的任何相关症状。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在我们机构由血管外科医生置入的所有跨越ECA起始部的ICA支架的临床资料。我们分析了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、支架类型和尺寸以及用药情况,以确定ECA狭窄的预测因素。

结果

2005年至2013年期间,共有72例(在总共119例ICA支架置入术中)患者(平均年龄71岁,68%为男性)接受了跨越ECA起始部的ICA支架置入术。6例患者(8.3%)术后ECA狭窄明显增加。没有出现闭塞情况。所有ECA狭窄患者的ICA支架均保持通畅且无症状。年龄、性别、合并症、支架类型和尺寸以及用药情况与支架置入术后的ECA狭窄无关。

结论

覆盖ECA起始部的ICA支架置入术后ECA狭窄并不常见,对于ICA支架通畅的患者在临床上也不具有显著意义。由于本研究未涉及,支架置入术后同时出现ECA和ICA狭窄的临床意义尚不清楚。如有必要,ECA狭窄的可能性不应妨碍跨越ECA起始部进行支架置入术。患者和支架因素不能预测ECA狭窄。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验