Geldart Thomas, Chester John, Casbard Angela, Crabb Simon, Elliott Tony, Protheroe Andrew, Huddart Robert A, Mead Graham, Barber Jim, Jones Robert J, Smith Joanna, Cowles Robert, Evans Jessica, Griffiths Gareth
Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Institute of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (GC regimen) represents a standard treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. We performed an open-label, single-arm, non-randomised, phase 2 trial evaluating the addition of sunitinib to standard GC chemotherapy (SGC regimen). Overall, 63 treatment-naïve participants were recruited and received up to six 21-d cycles of cisplatin 70 mg/m2 (intravenously [IV], day 1) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (IV, days 1 and 8) combined with sunitinib 37.5 mg (orally, days 2-15). Following review of toxicity after the first six patients, the sunitinib dose was reduced to 25 mg for all patients. Overall response rate was 64%, with response noted in 37 of 58 patients. At 6 mo, 30 of 58 assessable patients (52%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 40-63%) were progression free. Median overall survival was 12 mo (95% CI, 9-15) and was heavily influenced by Bajorin prognostic group. Grade 3-4 toxicities were predominantly haematologic and limited the deliverability of the triple SGC regimen. The trial did not meet its prespecified primary end point of >60% patients progression free at 6 mo. Cumulative myelosuppression led to treatment delays of gemcitabine and cisplatin and dose reduction and/or withdrawal of sunitinib in the majority of cases. The triple-drug combination was not well tolerated. Phase 3 evaluation of the triple SGC regimen in advanced transitional cell carcinoma is not recommended.
The addition of sunitinib to standard cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy was poorly tolerated and did not improve outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Treatment delivery was limited by myelotoxicity.
吉西他滨和顺铂化疗(GC方案)是晚期尿路上皮癌的标准治疗方法。我们开展了一项开放标签、单臂、非随机的2期试验,评估在标准GC化疗中加入舒尼替尼(SGC方案)的效果。总体而言,招募了63例未经治疗的参与者,接受最多6个21天周期的顺铂70mg/m²(静脉注射[IV],第1天)和吉西他滨1000mg/m²(IV,第1天和第8天)联合舒尼替尼37.5mg(口服,第2 - 15天)治疗。在对前6例患者的毒性进行评估后,所有患者的舒尼替尼剂量减至25mg。总体缓解率为64%,58例患者中有37例出现缓解。在6个月时,58例可评估患者中有30例(52%;90%置信区间[CI],40 - 63%)无进展。中位总生存期为12个月(95%CI,9 - 15),且受巴约林预后组的影响较大。3 - 4级毒性主要为血液学毒性,限制了三联SGC方案的实施。该试验未达到其预设的主要终点,即6个月时>60%的患者无进展。累积骨髓抑制导致大多数病例中吉西他滨和顺铂的治疗延迟以及舒尼替尼的剂量减少和/或停药。三联药物组合耐受性不佳。不建议对晚期移行细胞癌进行三联SGC方案的3期评估。
在标准顺铂和吉西他滨化疗中加入舒尼替尼耐受性差,并未改善晚期尿路上皮癌的预后。治疗的实施受到骨髓毒性的限制。