Suppr超能文献

直肠癌治疗中短程术前放疗联合即刻手术与长程放化疗联合延迟手术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Short-course preoperative radiotherapy with immediate surgery versus long-course chemoradiation with delayed surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Zhi-Rui, Liu Shi-Xin, Zhang Tian-Song, Chen Ling-Xiao, Xia Jun, Hu Zhi-De, Li Bo

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital of Jilin Province, No. 1018, Huguang Road, 130012 Changchun, PR China.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;23(4):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) with delayed surgery or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with immediate surgery is probably the most frequent regimen in the treatment of rectal cancer. Debate is still going on whether SCRT or LCRT is more effective. So we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SCRT with immediate surgery versus LCRT with delayed surgery for the management of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Literature were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library up to May, 2014. Quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated according to the Cochrane's risk of bias tool of RCT. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were employed to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

16 trials were included in the qualitative systematic review. 12 trials were included in meta-analyses. 4 of them were RCTs; other 8 were non-RCTs. Meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local recurrence rate (LRR), distant metastasis rate (DMR), sphincter preservation rate, R0 resection rate and late toxicity. Compared with SCRT, LCRT obviously increased pCR rate [RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.08, 0.28), P=0.003], while LCRT obviously increased the grade 3-4 acute toxicity [RR=0.13, 95%CI (0.06, 0.28), P<0.00001].

CONCLUSIONS

SCRT with immediate surgery is as effective as LCRT with delayed surgery for treatment of rectal cancer in terms of OS, DFS, LRR, DMR, Sphincter preservation rate, R0 resection rate and late toxicity. Though LCRT increased pCR rate, LCRT also increased acute toxicity compared with SCRT. SCRT is a better choice in centers with a long waiting list or lack of medical resources.

摘要

背景

长程放化疗(LCRT)联合延迟手术或短程放疗(SCRT)联合即刻手术可能是直肠癌治疗中最常用的方案。SCRT和LCRT哪种更有效仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估SCRT联合即刻手术与LCRT联合延迟手术治疗直肠癌的安全性和有效性。

方法

检索截至2014年5月的PubMed、Embase、Web of science、Cochrane图书馆中的文献。根据Cochrane随机对照试验(RCT)偏倚风险工具评估随机对照试验的质量。使用RevMan 5.3进行统计分析。计算合并风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。采用亚组分析和敏感性分析来探讨异质性。

结果

定性系统评价纳入16项试验。荟萃分析纳入12项试验。其中4项为RCT;其他8项为非RCT。荟萃分析表明,总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、局部复发率(LRR)、远处转移率(DMR)、括约肌保留率、R0切除率和晚期毒性方面无显著差异。与SCRT相比,LCRT明显提高了病理完全缓解率[RR = 0.15,95%CI(0.08,0.28),P = 0.003],而LCRT明显增加了3-4级急性毒性[RR = 0.13,95%CI(0.06,0.28),P < 0.00001]。

结论

SCRT联合即刻手术在OS、DFS、LRR、DMR、括约肌保留率、R0切除率和晚期毒性方面与LCRT联合延迟手术治疗直肠癌的效果相当。虽然LCRT提高了病理完全缓解率,但与SCRT相比,LCRT也增加了急性毒性。在等待名单长或缺乏医疗资源的中心,SCRT是更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验